Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2023 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Firmo, Andréa Acioly Maia
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Figueiredo, Luís Claudio Mendonça
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Psicologia: Psicologia Clínica
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e da Saúde
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/39665
|
Resumo: |
This work presents the modes of engendering creations in the forms of symbolic production under analysis. For this purpose, three clinical cases were analyzed, all already completed, followed by the author in the light of the psychoanalytic framework. Thus, from the use of objects created by patients who suffered traumatic situations early on – when the psyche did not yet have the support of verbal language and some refinement of the resources of thinking and feeling –, we observed that the patients were able to express, integrate and subjectively appropriate their own stories, previously mined in their representational possibilities. Furthermore, deepening the theme of the creations under analysis revealed different uses of the object created by the subject. It was observed that the creations work as a bridge for the communication of the primary sensory experience and the emergence of the emotional world; as a return to the archaic and childlike; as a defensive organization (refuge); as an attempt to repair; as an object to play with and experience transitionality; and, also, to symbolize, that is, to transform the unthought known into something better represented and provide the patient with the experience of being able to rebuild and redirect interrupted mourning. Finally, the fundamental role of the somewhat malleable attitude and sharing of the creations under analysis was observed so that the symbolization processes were resumed and acquired greater reflexivity and the possibility of significant transformation. In each case, the establishment of a therapeutic relationship of receptivity to the different modes of expression and communication presented by each patient through their created object was observed. It was also fundamental that the analytical framework was focused on the constitution of a space of hospitality and a somewhat malleable attitude on the part of the analyst, willing to work with the interlocution and legitimation of the toy - the created object - as a mediating resource of the analysis that enabled movements important for the resumption of associativity and, consequently, of the processes of symbolization in situations in which the stagnation and symbolic sterility directed to the events of life itself were marked |
