Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Rosa, Lucas Costa da
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Nunes Júnior, Vidal Serrano |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6836
|
Resumo: |
The objective of this study is to establish the situations in which public health care petitions deserve to be granted or denied by the judiciary as well as the contents of the jurisdictional provision. This is because the numerous lawsuits that proceed through the country with requests for medicines, treatments and various health care have raised doubts, including techniques in the Judiciary itself when faced with various claims, which sometimes turn out to be abusive. For this, the theme will be analyzed according to the Federal Constitution of 1988 and in the individual perspective of the subjective right to public health. The method will be the analysis of constitutional provisions of right to public health and access to the courts, as well as the current jurisprudence of the Supreme Court. Finally, we conclude be viable judicial decisions as individual execution mechanism of the right to public health, where this prerogative is unduly denied administratively by the public health service, as well as the legitimacy of the court orders of all recognized care and treatment by science as effective and authorized by the health authorities if they are needed, ie unavoidable and necessary (and not merely desirable) to ensure the health ("absence of disease") user |
