Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Lima, Alexandre Patucci de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Manzatto, Antônio |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Teologia
|
| Departamento: |
Teologia
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/18375
|
Resumo: |
The language became central issue in contemporary thought. In the classical tradition until the early twentieth century, it was designed primarily as a mere instrument of thought . This approach to language as a tool of thought, led to the search for a universal, neutral and objective language aiming at building up the science. In this way also philosophy in the early twentieth century, from some currents (positivism, Analytical Philosophy, Vienna Circle), started proceeding as language analysis in order to define what should be considered meaningful propositions which aggregate knowledge, this from a logical-mathematical analysis and especially from empirical verification. In these philosophers addressing, propositions of Metaphysics, Ethics, Religion and Theology are considered as meaningless . This approach, combined with other factors, put into question the theological language . However, in the very heart of philosophy, issues were deepened which allowed recovering the value of several other forms of languages. It was realized that scientific language is not the only one which conveys knowledge , but there are language games . Approaches such as Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Levinas and Paul Ricoeur deepened such plural aspect of language . Thus, ways were opened in which theology can (and should) reflect on the nature of its own language. In these ways Adolphe Gesché arises. He does not systematically address the theological language issue, not even his theology is structured as large system or manual. He offers fragments of reflection that allow us to think the matter. According to Gesché, it is necessary to hear again and recover the value of the words of faith . For him, theology has a speech entirely of its own about man and for man. In dialogue with contemporary culture, Gesché aims to show the specific rationality of faith s language and discourse, and thereby proclaim that God is good news for man |
