Para a crítica da teologia política: soberania, linguagem e inimigo

• Ano de defesa: 2011
• Autor(a) principal: Galvão Junior, João Carlos
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Políticas; Teoria Política e Interpretações do Brasil e Estado e Sociedade
• Palavras-chave em Português: Teologia Política; Crítica; Linguagem; Cristianismo; Soberania; Political Theology, Criticism; Language; Christianity; Sovereignty; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::CIENCIA POLITICA
• Link de acesso: https://app.uff.br/riuff/handle/1/20141

We work with the set of themes unit determinant of what Carl Schmitt calls the complexio oppositorum in the extensive world that appears with the will that constrains a formal unit, a reality in ones self unformed and irreducible to mediation, meaning, that from an aggregated force that, determined as a Will of decision [Wille zur dezision] entailed the Political concept. The one [the politician] hidden in Lacan, has his pass through languages and formed concepts while Gestalt of the enemy [other to other] to be extinguished or exterminated. In the non extensive world, a whole that conglobates more than a some of it s parts, while the manifestation of a totality that a complex of images [already being the psychology of shapes] reveals all it s theological power politician of mobilization for the psychic organization of imago. There would reside a capacity of mobilize collectively the souls of the mass; effect from the mobilizations of a representation and it s command theological-politician as a concrete result, making proof in the command of the mass in a strategic way in a universalized program driven in hierarchy of the images of decision [symbols]. The politician becomes a construction of images in the dominion of the mass and it s souls psychic [Psyche / Seele]. Tyranny of the images. Then the necessity of deconstruction and destruction of these symbols. These interpretations live as Nietzsche, Freud and Marx s specters in these writings. Marx in Benjamin, Freud in Lacan [in the past deconstruction in Lacan]; Nietzsche in intuitional aphorism in a interpretation without ending the language in general [of the things]. If some kind of hierarchy culturally established, there exists Gewalt. The negation of the negation will not come from the opposite but from the sacred space of circulation of the image of decision. This statute of my own or of a interior sovereignty must be deconstructed and destroid