Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2011 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Paula, Paula Ângela de Figueiredo e
 |
Orientador(a): |
Pacheco Filho, Raul Albino |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Psicologia: Psicologia Social
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e da Saúde
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/16937
|
Resumo: |
To defend the thesis that it is more appropriate to name the analyst s desire a love than social solidarity, it was first necessary to demonstrate that solidarity, as an ethical category of present times, arose specifically as a response to the social inequalities that are accentuated by capitalism. The theoretical basis for this study of love was consolidated on the three approaches in Lacan s teaching and that the solidarity is limited, being a type of love that has no virtue in itself as it is founded on the segregation of the different, so negating the otherness of the other. A distinction was made between joy and love, showing the analyst to be someone operating within the feminine logic of not-all as a means to escape the capitalist discourse. The thesis that analyst s desire is a more appropriate name of love than social solidarity was described by formulating a matheme. This should be sufficient to show analyst s desire to be the name of a new love . These two theses unite in my own desire to make psychoanalysis a political instrument for intervention in social contexts, overturning the currently hegemonic idea in our society that charitable solidarity should be the fundamental ethic capable of overcoming our social ills |