Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Souza, Sirleine Brandão de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Bueno, José Geraldo Silveira |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: História, Política, Sociedade
|
| Departamento: |
Educação
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/10425
|
Resumo: |
The objective of this investigation, concluded in 2013, was to analyze the curriculums of teacher education programs as being differentiated expressions of the theoretical-political perspectives that orient the schooling of special needs students. Based on the directives and actions that orient the implementation of such policies in teacher licensing courses, this study seeks to verify whether the universities contribute to the preparation of these teachers with a vision of inclusion. The analysis of courses of study for the year 2012 at four universities in the state of São Paulo, chosen based on the scores from the Índice Geral de Cursos (IGC), published by MEC in 2012, as well as scores from Times Higher Education (THE), sought to examine whether the teacher preparation programs dealt with the question of inclusion by looking at the specificities of the deficiencies, starting with terminology and classification in a vision of teacher preparation concerned with passing on specific techniques, or if there were social, political and pedagogical concerns related to the schooling of these students, a perspective which favors reflection on pedagogical practice. To this end, a qualitative-quantitative approach was adopted, making use of content analysis. Sources for data collection included program curricula and syllabi of courses that in some form approached the topic of the schooling of special needs students from each of the universities, with Cury (1998; 2002; 2011), Bueno (1999; 2002; 2008; 2011), Skrtic (1996), Imbernón (2005), Tardif (2011) and Nóvoa (1997) providing the theoretical framework. Principle findings include a diversity of themes related to Special Education or Inclusion in teacher preparation courses, with pedagogy being a priority; and a diversity in the emphases given to Special Education and/or Inclusion, seemingly reflecting the ambiguity inherent in the field, between a merely pragmatic perspective and one that is barely consistent with the viewpoint of social sciences, consequently not permitting for theoretical advances beyond the traditional foundations of biology and psychology, which end up restricting the deficiency to its individual manifestations |
