Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Rayel, Mara Lafourcade
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Pinheiro, Amálio |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/19529
|
Resumo: |
Based on the work Ethics, written in the 17th century by the philosopher Baruch Spinoza, and the ideas of Gilles Deleuze, philosopher of the 20th century, this work aimed to investigate what the human being can do when facing the capitalist world and its technodigital universe of connections, communication and fruition. Our goal was to highlight the concepts demonstrated in Ethics in composition with the formulations of thinkers and critics of contemporary capitalist society – such as Jesús Martín-Barbero, Roy Wagner, Félix Guattari, Mauricio Lazzarato, Manuel Delgado, Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, Paul Zumthor and Amálio Pinheiro. Our main question was: in what circumstances the conatus – tendency to persevere in existence –, becoming aware as a result of the affections suffered by the body and the mind (SPINOZA, 2007; DELEUZE, 2002), has effective conditions to assert itself in a differentiating way towards the hegemonic world vision disseminated throughout the media? Our hypothesis: despite the necessarily passive perception of conatus/desire, which operates in a continuous variation, driven by affects now of sadness, now of joy, something resists and invents new ways of relating. Therefore, while subjected to these variations and forming inadequate ideas, the human being finds ways to react and create in its relations with capitalism. We pointed out how joyful passions can contribute and provide different outputs from those of single world model in circulation in Western capitalist societies (LAZZARATO, 2006). We guide ourselves by the idea that relationships occur in an immanent way and not between subjects but between individuating affective states (DELEUZE, 2002). Based on Ethics, we advocate the understanding of the potency of affects as a mean to undertake an effort of reason to select the affects of joy, responsible for increasing the potency to acting (SPINOZA, 2007). Our method was guided by the identification of resistance movements and invention within the explanations of contemporary authors mentioned. The corpus of this work is organized as a dialogue between Ethics and such authors, always guided by the need to bring the body and the affects of joy as protagonists of our analysis |
