Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Ferreira, Anderson |
Orientador(a): |
Nascimento, Jarbas Vargas |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Língua Portuguesa
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20970
|
Resumo: |
The aim of this thesis is to examine, in contemporary society, the production of discursive reading in digital space, crossed by journalistic media. In this sense, this research proposes to identify the enunciative positions of the subjects of discourse and to verify, in the production of reading, ways of negotiating the sense effects in the discursive space of exchanges in the field of opinion. By the end of the twentieth century, the relationship with reading, in terms of form and media, had been significantly transformed by the advent of information and communication technologies. The printed text began to compete with the digital texts and the materiality of the book became immaterial, producing large digitized cultural collections. In the field of discourse, for instance, the notions of reading, genre of discourse, textuality and authorality were revisited and amplified due to the development of the digital mídiuns. This aspect gave rise to research that began to consider the modes of production and diffusion of discourses and their influence on the production of reading. The reader-subject, in this scenario, had been incited to mobilize diverse discursive skills and memories, producing the reading of the intricate world to the reading of the discourse in function of their expectations and needs. Otherwise, contemporaneity demanded of the reader a greater interaction with the world, in the moment in which the speech took place. Thus, in order to gain autonomy and face alterity, the reader has been occupying the condition of reading subject, producing and creating sense effects in the field of dissent. From this perspective, the examination of reading in the field of discourse has enabled us to grasp the issue of negotiating the sense effects, in its relation to power, ethics, democracy, citizenship, knowledge, and sociocommunication devices and enunciative and their modes of production, dissemination and reception of discourses, as well as with the notions of time, space and subject. Our hypothesis is that the reader, when articulating the socio-historical and cultural dimension with the discursive domain, occupies the condition of subject in the negotiations of the sense effects. For our study, we took as a theoretical-methodological reference the Discourse Analysis, in particular, the one practiced by Dominique Maingueneau (1997; 1998; 2000; 2006a; 2006b; 2007a; 2007b; 2008a; 2008b; 2008c; 2011; 2013a; 2013b; 2014, 2015, 2016). Also, in order to apprehend the notions of modernity, postmodernity and culture, the reflections produced in the theoretical frameworks of Philosophy, Sociology, Geography, Education, Literature and Anthropology were mobilized. In turn, historical-cultural studies grounded the discussions in the field of reading and writing practices, resignifying the problematic of the reader's mobility in its relation with the reading corpus. We test our hypothesis that the articulation of socio-historical and cultural conditions with the discursive domain provides the reader with the condition of subject. This condition produces a reading gesture that calls for the negotiation of the sense effects as a discursive mechanism in the production of reading. The association of the placements in the discursive space of exchanges in the field of opinion revealed that the communication between the reader, the other and the world occurs at the core of semantic, historical and cultural constraints that, when mobilized, become effective for the confrontation of otherness |