Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Teles, Francisco Afranio Rodrigues
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Liberali, Fernanda Coelho |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da Linguagem
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21494
|
Resumo: |
The main objective of this research is to investigate the agency constitution of adolescents who participate in the Digit-M-Ed Project Parnaíba-PI. Specifically, it aims to identify how the argumentation is organized in the discursive interactions of the Digit-M-Ed Parnaíba participants, and to analyze how development opportunities of adolescents’ agency are created in this Project. The research assumes that the school context, in general, is usually embedded in a silence culture, understood as a set of representations and behaviors expressed by the dependency condition that controls the students' ways of being, thinking and expressing, reflecting the social structure of macro domination. Considering this, collaborative argumentation is seen as a producer of unsilencing possibilities, advocated as the recognition, by participants, of the conditions equity and their action capacities as agents, in the spaces in which they are inserted. The research is grounded in the theoretical-methodological choices of the Language in Activity in the School Context Research Group, of PUC-SP, based on the Social-Historical-Cultural Activity Theory. This theoretical framework supports reflections on argumentation and critical collaboration in the school context, methodologically developed by the Critical Collaborative Research, that focuses on the development and collective intervention of its participants. Two Workshops, ocurred in the second half of 2015, constituted the context of production and data collection in Digit-M-Ed Parnaíba. The research participants are members of the Project, composed by leaders, teachers, administrators, mothers and students of a public Elementary School. The analysis and interpretation of data are based on the Bakhtinian view of dialogic-enunciative language, considering argumentative, enunciative, discursive and multimodal categories, guided by the following interpretative categories: argumentation for submission, collaborative argumentation, silencing and unsilencing. The study reveals that the argumentation has an essential role in the adolescents' constitution, considering two aspects: on the one hand, when there is no collaboration, the argumentation seems to point to the maintenance of submissive subjects, emphasizing the idea of silenced adolescents; on the other hand, when there is collaboration, the argumentation gives indications of a language that subsidizes opportunities for the development of the adolescents' agency, fulfilling the necessary conditions for an unsilenced act. At times, for example, teens remain quiet, are ignored, or receive adult authorization to participate. In others, they enter freely, presenting and justifying concordant or controversial positions; are questioned or ask about the content proposed for discussion. The research yields subsidies for the reorganization of how language is structured in the discourses of Digit-M-Ed Parnaíba participants, creating bases for critical and collaborative interventions |
