Suppressio e surrectio: natureza, efeitos, aplicabilidade e análise comparativa com figuras jurídicas correlatas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2015
Autor(a) principal: Paula, Luiza Checchia Stuart Cunha de
Orientador(a): Cambler, Everaldo Augusto
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6693
Resumo: The paper analyzes the institutes of surrectio and suppressio, differentiating them from related figures, demonstrating its practical applicability and discussing questions on the topic. First of all, it analyzes the principles of good faith and trust, whose understanding it is deemed essential to the understanding of the topic. Examines the objective good faith focused on sealing the contradictory behavior, and in the famous theory of proper actions. Traces a historical context of the suppression of contradictory behavior, showing the evolution of the need to protect trust as the foundation of existence of a legal relationship. Studies the origin of the concepts of suppressio and surrectio, conceptualizes institutes and characterized their assumptions of existence and of the appropriateness of its assumptions. Discusses the concept and the applicability of other figures arising from the principle that prohibits the contradictory behavior and their chances of appropriateness, bringing its implementation in doctrine and jurisprudence. Studies the effects of suppressio and surrectio and the distinction of the practical application in relation to prescription, estoppel, novation and similar institutes. Shows the current scenario of the use of these figures by the operators of Brazilian law, as well as other institutes, based on analysis of relevant judgments by Brazilian Courts