Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2024 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Aranha, Rodrigo Domingues de Castro Camargo
 |
Orientador(a): |
Nucci, Guilherme de Souza
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/41809
|
Resumo: |
Social evolution in the post-industrial period significantly influenced Criminal Law. The expansion of the protection of supra-individual goods, crimes of abstract danger and the use of imputation by omission are just a few examples. However, this criminal expansionism, at some point, ended up subverting the legal system and transformed Criminal Law into a tool to try to solve any violation of legal interests however insignificant they may be, in violation of the principle of minimum intervention, inherent to the concept of legal good in Criminal Law. In this same punitive movement, to maintain the proportionality of the legal system, the legislator ended up imposing very low penalties for the crimes in question, which, invariably, culminates in the application of pecuniary penalties, which does not satisfy the purposes of criminal sanction and also generates discredit in the Judiciary. Thus, the present work proposes a joint analysis of criminal and administrative offenses and sanctions to establish a dialogue between Criminal Law and Sanctioning Administrative Law as types of Punitive Law, aiming to give effectiveness to national prosecution and achieve the purposes of the criminal penalty |