Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Balzano, Felice
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Shimura, Sergio Seiji |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/19837
|
Resumo: |
The thesis dogmatically analyzes the prohibition of the venire contra factum proprium − created and widely developed in current civil procedural law, and integral of the general objective good faith clause. The interest in the theme emerged from an important gap in the scientific field, considering that the rule that foresees the prohibition of contradictory behavior is separately positived in the procedural legal order, appearing as ratio decidendi in several precedents of the Brazilians courts, especially of the Superior Courts, and which culminated in the formation of a substantial jurisprudential construction. That is to say there is the prescriptive language of the norm involving the prohibition of contradictory behavior in the process, with wide applicability, however there is not enough descriptive metalanguage relative to it. This vertiginous growth in the intensity of use of the institute in the Brazilian legal scenario has also brought about a side effect, only justified in the absence of a solid scientific basis, which is the lack of criterion at the moment of application of the norm. Natural it may be, since while the activity of the courts provides the conduct standard to be followed by the society, the scientific production provides guidance for the courts to properly apply the norm to the particular case. This is the ideal legitimating environment for a deeper delineation of the dogmatic aspects of the institute, covering its genesis, its requirements, legal nature, efficacy, content, and incidence hypotheses |
