Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Castro Bisnetto, Lauro Simões de
 |
Orientador(a): |
Nery Junior, Nelson |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7086
|
Resumo: |
The dissertation achieves a comparative critic between the culture of judicial precedents in the common s law order and the dogmatic of the decisions binding systematized by the New Civil Procedure Code (L. 13.105/15). We intend to illustrate a secular decision s practice that shows itself complex and to question what seems to be a precipitated import of this juridical experience. The possibility of thinking this analysis is discovered by philosophy. Stem from the phenomenological hermeneutic of Martin Heidegger confronted to the Immanuel s Kant epistemology we shed some light on the happening of precedents in oppose to the pre-determined binding decisions. The interpretative possibilities of both systems are explored in order to become viable a compromised critic. Finally, the work presents a possible post-positivist comprehension to the hermeneutic application of binding decisions, a behavior expectative based on integrity and stability of Law in favor of grounded jurisdictional answers |