Reclamação constitucional: instrumento de garantia da efetividade dos julgados e da preservação da competência do Supremo Tribunal Federal

• Ano de defesa: 2007
• Autor(a) principal: Macedo, André Puppin
• Orientador(a): Garcia, Maria
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Reclamação constitucional; Brasil > Supremo Tribunal Federal; Controle de constitucionalidade > Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Constitutional claim
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO CONSTITUCIONAL
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7701

This paper aims at the theoretical and practical analysis of the Constitutional Claim in correlation with the Brazilian Federal Constitution itself, and besides its own function, concept, content, boundaries, efficacy and legitimacy One can verify that Constitutional Claim has three different purposes: at first, to preserve the competence of both the Supreme Federal Court and the Superior Court of Justice; at second, to Grant authority and accomplishment to their decisions; and, finally, to grant accomplishment to the so called obligating summula which means the definitive and forceable decision about some controversy which becomes pacified according to a range of similar jurisprudence from the Supreme Court. In this step, Constitutional Claim shows a huge importance in legal order, as a relevant means of granting the principle of the supremacy of the constitution and the principle of the legal safety . Before addressing the core of the matter, we will approach the control of constitutionality related to the Supreme Federal Court and its role as the Guardian of the Federal Constitution. The Constitutional Claim despite of being a Brazilian Supreme Court praetorian construction, explicitly inspired in North-American law institutes like the Implied Powers Theory is nowadays formally prescribed in the Constitutional Text. Beyond the research on the historic arise of the Constitutional Claim, at the Supreme Court, since no more than half a century, the modern Constitutional Claim is to be analyzed, about its application at the superior and the regular courts, and about its concept, legal nature, legitimacy, the permissive hypothesis and finally the knowledge related to its very procedure