Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2023 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Santos, Silvana Almeida
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Katz, Helena
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/39291
|
Resumo: |
During the socio-sanitary crisis, the use of screens has increased even more, expanding the changes that were already present in our behavior and in the way we communicate. Our relationship with the environment is increasingly intricate: understandings of mobility and place, of time and space, of public and private are no longer the same, They transform ouselves and transform us incessantly. This research is born from the observation that, in the changes that were already underway, since the screens install their presence in everyday life, other transformations occurred during the period of social isolation, which promoted the increase in the use of digital communication in this period. It takes as its object the protagonism that orality gained, especial in that period, for a large part of the population, because to work and education happening on-line, and sociability having been reduced, for them, to the family environment. In this online life, the orality became concomitant with the image of the subject who was speaking (and now is seeing themselves speaking), expanding the traditional understanding of orality, as it added a kind of scenic performativity for the subject himself who, until then, was in the domain only those who watched. The hypothesis is that the intensification of this type of orality, which even started to be regulated by its own etiquette, has it has cognitive consequences that should be investigated, with the intension of contributing to reflections in the field of communication. Complementarily, the concepts of information (LOGAN, 2015) and homeostasis (DAMÁSIO, 2018) will be brought up, as well as authors who help us read the body in the current stage of capitalism, in which technology has an ostensive presence (AGAMBEN, 2004, 2010, 2014; COLINS, 2019; DARDOT AND LAVAL, 2017; COMITE INVISIBLE, 2017; FEDERICI, 2019; LEMKE, 2018; MBEMBE, 2018), BUTLER (2004). To reflect on the on going cognitive transformations, texts by BRIDLE (2019); GREEN (2013); HAN (2017) and KATZ (2015, 2019). On the topic of the implications on speech impacted by social syndromes will be employed on speech impacted by social syndromes will have the contributions of DUNKER (2015) and SAFATLE (2015). For a critical reading on the use of technologies, MANOVICH (2013), PARISIER (2011) and SIBILIA (2014) will be invited. And on the issue of orality/speech, TURKLE (2015), TANNEN (1990) and ZELDIN (2008) |
