Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Vieira, Rubens Carlos
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Beznos, Clovis
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6739
|
Resumo: |
This work aims to study the law regarding accusation in disciplinary actions. It begins by investigating the disciplinary powers of Public Administration, their nature and principles. Then, due to the importance of understanding the related process systematics of the Disciplinary Law, the procedural principles and guarantees provided in the 1988 Federal Constitution are analyzed, with special emphasis on those inherent to the accused. After defining some essential concepts and principles, a detailed analysis is made of those affected by the law of accusation, from perspective of the accuser and from that of whoever responds to the accusation. The focus then passes to studying and defining the minimum proportion of the accusation that must be reported to the subject involved and the right timing for making the accusation known, to ensure due and effective application of the abovementioned procedural principles. Finally, the provisions of Federal Law no. 8,112, dated December 11th, 1990, are compared to the law governing the right to be informed of the accusation, in order to verify their compatibility with the principles that should guide the administrative disciplinary action process |
