Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Santos, Alex Gonçalves dos
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Silva, Ademir Alves da |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Serviço Social
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Sociais
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21016
|
Resumo: |
This research is the result of a journey of reflections in the academic route, when it comes to the state of the bourgeois sociability and its consequences, like the "historical ground" of the origins of the Brazilian Social Work and the insertion of Marx's thought into the profession. This study intends to contribute to the debate on controversial aspects of the Social Work, focusing on the understanding of the profession, its advances as well as limits. A profession that is unthinkable outside the historical reality of the development of capitalism since its dawning, around the sixteenth century, its "uneven and mixed" progression spread throughout the globe, its inability to eliminate social differences, as well as deepening existing ones. Hence, the need to create mechanisms of intervention in this reality shows up, sugarcoating the historically determined aspects through actions with strong bonds of good will and religious charity. Thus, The Social work emerges as an institutionalized legal profession within the context of monopoly capitalism, where the imperialist era intensifies, and, with its development, stands as a theoretically positioned profession alongside the working class which many professionals share its values. However, the ideals, values, and critical positioning were confined amongst a restricted group of people and organizations, not reaching those professionals who actually work in the field. The organizations of the group usually make progressive speeches, which do not reach the professional base, consequently perpetuating every speech disconnected from the reality as well as those disciplinary talks to the professionals of the base without even trying to establish any dialogue between different ideas. They criticize the practice of the field professional, almost no longer being there, "on the trenches." Simultaneously, the academy closes itself, without further integration in everyday reality. There are people in the organizations and those others who participate in them, teachers and students of the academy resisting, struggling, standing closer to the professional base, but what sticks are the punishing and far from reality speeches |
