Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Daniel, Marcos Nakano
 |
Orientador(a): |
González Porta, Mário Ariel,
Transcendental logic |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Filosofia
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21572
|
Resumo: |
Our main objective, in this thesis, is to compare the idea of Logic of consequence, introduced, for the first time, in Formal and Transcendental Logic (1929), and the conceptions adopted by Edmund Husserl in the Logical Investigations. We try to show, firstly, the role that have, in the Logical Investigations, the notions of signification, fulfilling, intuitions and categorial intuitions, in order to determine the way Husser conceives the epistemological foundations of Logic. Next, we describe the concept of Logic of consequence in Formal and transcendental Logic. This level of Logic, between Morfology and Formal logic of truth, is determined by the exclusion of the concepts of truth and falsity, as determining concepts of its thematic field. Through this process of analysis, we arrive, then, at the conclusion that the idea of Logic of consequence was not present in the Logical Investigations. Rather, the conceptions adopted in the Logical Investigations, are such that they are incompatible with the notion of Logic of consequence |