Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Valim, Pedro Losa Loureiro
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Lopes, João Batista |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/19821
|
Resumo: |
The present dissertation concentrates the analysis on the institute of stabilization of the decisions taken in anticipation of tutelage, granted in antecedent character, normative novelty introduced in the national juridical order with the advent of the New Code of Civil Procedure. In the light of the Federal Constitution, there is a need for a fast, adequate and effective judicial protection, responding to the collective's wishes, in the face of a growing judicialization of litigation. With due regard to the constitutional principle of judicial review, in accordance with subsection XXXV of article 5 of the Federal Constitution, the law can not exclude from the review of the Judiciary an injury or threat to any right. It is not enough, however, for the implementation of the constitutional command, to ensure only formal access to the Judiciary. An appropriate, fast and effective judicial response must also be provided. Based on material and procedural summarization, differentiated jurisdictional protection techniques, in the conception of the Italian teacher Andrea Proto Pisani, represents a response to the aspirations of society. In agreement with the French and Italian laws, there is a tendency towards autonomy and independence of summary judicial protection, if both parties are therefore in favor. It is not always advantageous for the parties to be obliged to be submitted to the exhaustion of cognition and the continuation of the procedural legal relationship. In certain cases, both the plaintiff and the defendant are satisfied with the summary judicial protection granted, and therefore have no interest in obtaining a state response that is fulfilled in exaggerated cognition. The autonomy and independence of summary judicial protection, in this scenario, represents an alternative to assure the rights in a reasonable time, allowing more effectiveness and celerity. The present dissertation, in the light of these characteristics, analyzes the stabilization of the decisions taken in anticipation of tutelage, granted in antecedent character, as well as its compatibility with the constitutional model of civil process |
