Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2020 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Santos, Verônica Fleury Pavan Roriz dos
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Ramos, Carla Teresa Martins |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/22971
|
Resumo: |
The Law n. 13,467, effective November 11, 2017, introduced amendments that go against the norms of protection of women's work. It consists of restrictive changes to the core and scope of the protection provided for in Article 7, XX, of the 1988 Constitution. A law repealed Article 384 of the Labor Code, suppressing the right of women to at least 15 minutes of safe rest. between the end of normal time and the execution of the journey. We understand that this special interval was compatible with the constitutional norm, not being discriminatory norm. From these foundations, both the STF and the TST have already decided that the device was being received by the Major Law. Understand what is the reflection of the reduction of this right, that is, the effect called the slack effect, the second US law or the judgment of judicial decisions on decorative political issues of side effect, a sudden movement of political power against a claim of the judiciary. Moreover, by virtue of the prohibition on retrogression, it argues for the unconstitutionality and unconventionality of such revocation. In addition, a new law amended as rules on the work of pregnant and lactating women in unhealthy activities. On occasion, either Supreme Registered or unconstitutional locked device, or that provides us with two lines of research. The first is that this understanding is not capable of restricting or accessing women in the labor market. The second is the question that declares partial unconstitutionality of article 394-A of the CLT, the legislator is not prevented from promulgating another law, with content identical to the text declared unconstitutional by the Court. An end of research problem solving demonstrates the need for a constant core legal, social and political politics that compares a working woman. From its social point of view, the importance of the action of the Public Prosecution Service as a defender of women's social rights is important |
