Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2014 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Marques, Miguel Ângelo
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Guimarães, Antonio Márcio da Cunha |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6542
|
Resumo: |
In Brazil, the Legislative branch has always been present in the process of establishment and conclusion of International Treaties. In the Imperial Period, even though the 1824 Charter Policy did not formally provide for the General Assembly participation, it could conceivably be said that the conduct of the foreign affairs was carried out in practice by four State agencies: the Emperor, the Cabinet of Ministers, the Council of State and the Parliament. From the Proclamation of the Republic, all the constitutional texts provided expressly for the participation of the National Congress in the process of production of Treaty Texts. However none of our Constitutions ‒ including the current one ‒ has handled the participation of the Legislative branch in cases of termination of treaty texts and thus the power to cease the treat has always been exclusively held by the Executive branch (even in those cases where the ratification of the international instrument depended on the National Congress approval). This much discussed issue in the doctrine field has been brought to the Supreme Federal Court on June 16th, 1997 by the means of the Direct Unconstitutionality Action (ADI) 1625 that pleaded the declaration of unconstitutionality of Decree 2,100 of December 20th, 1996 which made public the cease of the Convention 158 of the International Organization of Labor (OIT) for offence to the provisions of art. 49, I of the Constitution. Within the scope of the judgment of this process filed by the National Confederation of the Workers in Agriculture (CONTAG) and the Central Workers Union Confederation (CUT), three out the four Ministers who have already voted have acknowledged the need of prior consent from the National Congress to the Executive branch to proceed to the termination of Treaty Texts. If this understanding persists in the C. Supreme Federal Court there will be an important change of model in the field of the Law of Treaties, which is a basic issue under the international law. This Master s dissertation aims to foster discussions within the academic community concerning the need (or not) for the Brazilian Parliament participation in Treaties, Conventions and International Acts termination process |
