Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Pieroni, Claudio Giovanni
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Martins, Adalberto |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20731
|
Resumo: |
The possibility of carrying out a review of employees, in any of its types, is a procedure commonly used by employers, as part of its directive and supervisory powers. Except for the provisions of the article 373-A of the Brazilian Labor Code, which prohibits the intimate review of female employees, the Brazilian legislation is silent regarding the possibility, the different types, the procedures applicable and/or the limits to be observed in case of its occurrence. In this context, a controversy has been established in the doctrine and jurisprudence regarding the possibility of carrying out a review of employees and the eventual restrictions to be observed. Based on the clear conflict of fundamental rights, on one hand the intimacy of the employee and on the other the right to propriety of the employers (exercised through the directive power), the Superior Labor Court has repeatedly stated in its decisions that the review procedure is possible, provided some minimum requirements, such as impersonality. The heart of the matter, however, refers to the principle of proportionality, the true doctrinal tool capable of settling this flagrant collision |
