Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Dantas, André Ribeiro
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Alvim, Eduardo Arruda |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6347
|
Resumo: |
The present study focuses on the possibility of granting measures of urgency and evidence in arbitration. We divided this study in two parts, the first part, more theoretical, we analysed the concept, features, the specifics functions of this type of jurisdiction and also the powers granted by law to the arbitrator or compromissarius, to conclude about the legal classification of the arbitration At the second part, after considerations related to the constitutional basis of measures of urgency and evidence used in the arbitration, we studied several hypothesis for granting such temporary measures, before or even after it had started the arbitration, in cases that the Arbitration Agreement or the arbitration clause allows, or the clause omit or even prohibit , to grant measures of urgency and evidence. Finally, we considered the possibilities of review by the referee, of urgent measures granted by the Judicial System, and vice versa |
