O congelamento da atividade judicante no direito do consumidor: um estudo a partir dos contratos bancários

• Ano de defesa: 2012
• Autor(a) principal: Lenzi, Gisele Ilana
• Orientador(a): Federighi, Suzana Maria Pimenta Catta Preta
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Poder judiciário; Relações de consumo; Atividade judicante; Contratos bancários; Súmula 381 do STJ
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Judicial power; Consumption relationships; Statutory control; Bank contracts; Precedent 381 of the Superior Court of Justice (Brazil)
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/5881

This dissertation was developed and grounded on Consumers‟ Rights and Bank Contracts, more specifically on the Precedent 381 of the Superior Court of Justice (Brazil).The aim of this paper is to analyze the applicability of the statutory control and its consequences in consumption relationships of bank contracts. Exploratory research with deductive reasoning supported by bibliographic techniques to assemble jurists‟ prevailing opinion, and court precedents, including bank actions data in the consumption market were applied. It is organized in three chapters to enable encompassing proposed theme. Firstly, we analyze the general contractual legal transaction basis and its compliance with constitutional and civil principles. Then, we discuss the consumers‟ rights and their principles, contractual abusive terms and clauses with occasional reviews. In the third chapter, we approach bank special contracts focusing on the judicial activity-freezing phenomenon, showing procedural institutes to advance and accelerate lawsuits solution. We also approach the choice process for the best decision of the arbitrator/justice, mainly on grounds of reasonableness and proportionality. The result of the research indicates the incoherent effect caused by occasional use of the Precedent 381 of the Superior Court of Justice in the defense of the consumer, considering the elimination of such statutory control, provided it does not meet its purpose, disrespecting consumers‟ rights, with an exclusive privilege to supply bank. Furthermore, it discredits the ideal of justice by treating subjects of rights as objects