Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2020 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Barros, Maria Gabriella Dignani Schmidt de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Cahali, Francisco José |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23066
|
Resumo: |
The current essay approaches arbitration such as a proper mean to conflict resolution, and its relation towards the interim protection. The current legislative changes, either in the arbitration law or in the civil procedure code, demand attention and study, because they have changed the systematization of the protection. Also, a brief analysis was made about the conflict and the existing ways to its solution, without the State to be seen as a central element. The means that proper conflict resolution are known today in its brilliance, and this very fact not only highlights, but also seeks the social pacification. As the essay develops, one can notice that arbitration is not only a kind of jurisdiction, but it contributes for the democratization of the own Brazilian judiciary power, to such an extent that the several problems found can be solved not only with a proper redaction of the arbitral convention, but also with jurisdictional cooperation between judges and arbiters |
