Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Galmacci, Thanyelle
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Saule Júnior, Nelson |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/5828
|
Resumo: |
The difficulty that the Government is to promote and guarantee the right to housing has its origin in the period of discovery and distribution of land in Brazil. The methods brought by the Portuguese crown to give the land use resulted in large estates and urban spatial segregation. In Brazil, the right to housing, mentioned in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, got the status of fundamental right, expressed in the 1988 Brazilian Federal Constitution, just in 2000. As a consequence of the lack of public housing policies, the illegal occupations have become part of the context of the city, especially in large urban centers. The regularization then became an important instrument to guarantee the legal security of tenure in these occupations and improve the quality of life and living conditions in this population. The law regulated the 11.977/2009 tenure and brought two new tools to assist in this process, the urban demarcation and legalization of possession, allowing the Government to use new instruments to promote the right to housing and the creation of better living conditions for low-income population |
