Entre Direito Penal e criminologia crítica: uma nova agenda de pesquisa a partir da relação entre Günther Jakobs e Niklas Luhmann

• Ano de defesa: 2014
• Autor(a) principal: Barreira, César Mortari
• Orientador(a): Junqueira, Gustavo Octaviano Diniz
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Direito Penal; Criminologia crítica; Jakobs; Luhmann
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Criminal Law; Critical criminology
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6668

This Master s thesis aims to examine the contribution capacity of the autopoietic social systems theory of Niklas Luhmann for new studies both within criminal law as in the context of criminological thought. The research starts from the diagnosis that Luhmann's theory is consistently interpreted as a foundation of Günther Jakobs criminal justice system, without therewith being made any rigorous analysis about the context in which Luhmann's thinking is inserted and about the possible change of meaning that occurred in the transportation of these concepts from sociology to the criminal legal dogmatic. These analytical deficits constitute the main justification for the research hypothesis, namely the possibility that the critical potential of Luhmann's theory generally ignored can contribute to a new research agenda for the criminal legal dogmatic and to the critical criminology. For that, after analyzing the meaning given by Jakobs to Luhmann s concepts in the course of his work and presenting the main concepts of the autopoietic social systems theory and its application in the study of law, it is argued that the meaning given by Jakobs to Luhmann s concepts is arbitrary. As a result, it is understood that a rigorous understanding of the assumptions of this sociological theory can contribute to enhance critically some of Jakobs writings, opening a door for new studies in criminal legal dogmatic, while at the same time that it may enhance the studies in the context of critical criminology