Aplicabilidade da tutela provisória do novo Código de Processo Civil, no sistema de proteção às relações familiares

• Ano de defesa: 2017
• Autor(a) principal: Hashimoto, Marcos Noboru
• Orientador(a): Pinto, Nelson Luiz
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Brasil - Código de Processo Civil (2015); Tutela provisória; Ações de família; Brazil - Code of Civil Procedure (2015); Provisional guardianship; Family actions
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20476

With the advent of the new Code of Civil Procedure (Law 13.105, March 16, 2015), the theme / Book of "Provisional Tutorship" proved to be worthy of the most in-depth debate by scholars of civil procedural law, (CPC / 73, articles 796-889) and the "Anticipation of Tutorship" (CPC / 73, article 273), of the revoked Code of Civil Procedure (Law No. 5,869, dated January 11, 1973), bringing a new panorama to the matter. At the same time, the legislator of the new Statute of Procedure was concerned with expressly providing for the provision of provisional custody measures in the area of family actions (CPC / 2015, art. 695), which were placed in the context of special Jurisdiction; Without prejudice to the specific legal procedures applicable to the matter of Family Law, and their emergency measures. In view of this, we envisioned the debate about the applicability of the mechanism of provisional guardianships, in their species, assumptions and objectives, to family demands; In particular, considering the inherent peculiarities of the latter, in order to verify if the new norms will bring greater effectiveness to the solution of emergency situations. Whether it is possible to systematize the question or whether the solution will be subsumed by the judge's appropriateness of the courts, and under what criteria, given the highly subjective aspect of choice, the polycentric and multifaceted nature of family conflicts