Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Magnani, Nathércia Cristina Manzano
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Piovesan, Flávia Cristina |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6300
|
Resumo: |
This project aims to understand which base(is) of the human and fundamental rights is (are) predominant in the jurisprudence s construction in effect for indigenous communities of Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) and of the Supreme Federal Court (STF). In order to do so, three theories have been studied aiming to found the human and fundamental rights: universalism, cultural relativism and the critical perspective of the theoretical text present in the literary works of Joaquín Herrera Flores. After that based on collected and analyzed data, it was possible, based on comparison analyzes, to run a quantitative and qualitative study to conclude that the first jurisprudence (IACHR) is more open for the dialogue and confluency universalism. The conclusion was also based in the fact that the first jurisprudence (IACHR) has been interpreting violations committed against indigenous population as well as communal violations therefore highlighting the importance of cultural identity rights of the indigenous population, the right to be consulted and reinforcing their rights to have a dignified life |
