Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2010 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Castillo, Ana Rebeca Miranda
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Silva, Maria José Ferreira da |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação Matemática
|
| Departamento: |
Educação
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11470
|
Resumo: |
The objective of the current work is to investigate the teaching activity held in the Project proposed by Government Department of Education in the State of São Paulo to schools that work full time, this Project is called Workshop Mathematical Experiences. We based our theoretical Activity Theory view of Engeström (1999) who proposes an activity system composed of the elements: subject, object, mediator artifact, rules, community and work division. We consider the teacher as the active subject working in the workshop, the mathematical subject worked is the objective, the Workshop Mathematical Experiences is the mediator artifact, the project proposal and the guideline are the rules, the students parents and the school s teachers is the community and the power of teachers decision and the others individuals at school is the work division. Based on this system we analyzed the contradiction between all these groups, with the purpose to answer our research question: How the identification of contradictions in relations between the components of an activity system developed at the Workshop Mathematical Experiences, may help us to understand its operation? So we used a qualitative approach and followed the methodology of case study, because we decided to pay attention to two teachers at a public school they teach at the Workshop Mathematical Experiences. During the data gathering we used an initial questionnaire, we watched the classes and finally we had a semi-structured interview. The data analysis showed us through the contradictions identified that the Workshop Mathematical Experiences proposal, as well as its guidelines, are known and implemented by the interviewed teachers in a superficial way, in other words, the Workshop Mathematical Experiences is not developed by them as available resources, which shows us the need to expand the work with the Workshop Mathematical Experiences in order to promote its effective carrying out and consistent with the needs of the educational scene requires |
