Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Rolim, José Francisco de Souza
![lattes](/bdtd/themes/bdtd/images/lattes.gif?_=1676566308) |
Orientador(a): |
Fessel, Regina Vera Villas Bôas |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7011
|
Resumo: |
The present work has the scope to examine the new paradigms in human relationship with the environment, so that the right can respond effectively to the many emerging demands, without losing sight of the essential component of human dignity. Scientific analysis had as reference the doctrine study, native and foreign country, of the legislation and judicial behavior in face of the subject discussed. From this perspective, to analyze the current predisposition of the law, one seeks to understand how environmental laws can be related to fundamental rights and personality of the individual. By examining this dynamic, being the right to healthy and ecologically balanced environment a fundamental right, this right can perfectly merge with the general right of personality, forming a fundamental right of personality to the environment where humans can fully develop their qualities and essential attributes. The connection of environmental law with the fundamental right and the right to personality is supported on the theory of complexity of Edgar Morin, where it is possible to extend the legal nature of the right to the environment. In addition, the study faces the problem of how damage caused to the environment can affect the human being. For this purpose, the present study turns the attention to the theoretical aspects that allow the configuration of moral damage subject to compensation to the human being compared to the environmental damage. Thus, one can conclude that the ecological damage is not the only damage to the balance of the environment (pure environmental damage), affecting also other fundamental values, such as the right of personality and human dignity (environmental damage reflection or rebound) |