O consentimento do ofendido nos injustos culposos de prática médica

• Ano de defesa: 2010
• Autor(a) principal: Menezes, Bruno Seligman de
• Orientador(a): Souza, Paulo Vinicius Sporleder
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul; Porto Alegre
• Palavras-chave em Português: DIREITO PENAL; BIOÉTICA; CULPABILIDADE; CONSENTIMENTO ESCLARECIDO; RESPONSABILIDADE PENAL; PRÁTICA PROFISSIONAL
• Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/10923/1717

The following dissertation linked to the Contemporary Judicial-Penal System research line of PPGCCrim/PUCRS, tried to investigate the possibility of the term of informed consent, proper institute of bioethics, to have juridical-penal effects in crimes resulting from the medical practice. In an attempt to respond to the problem proposed, defined a theoretical framework for the consent from Claus Roxin and Manuel da Costa Andrade theories. The latter appeared more appropriate in that it can respond more fully, solely within the dogmatic criteria without resorting to more open, vacant, as in the first, which uses parameters of political-criminal situations very punctual. Thus, despite all the analysis of consent, it ends up being used differently, for negligent crimes. This is because with respect to intentional, the agreement represents a convergence of wills to accomplish the typical crime. In the negligent ones, by contrast, the convergence of wills is not to accomplish the typical crime. Consent is to create an exposure to the legal protection. Among the findings, resulting in the removal of clumsiness as a constituent element of negligent crimes, and also the rejection of the conduct consented to by this failure of duty of care order, if carried out within the lex artis. The solution is also from the removal of authenticity, according to the theory of objective attribution.