Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Monteiro, Rui Anderson Costa
 |
Orientador(a): |
Santos, Jos?? Eduardo de Oliveira |
Banca de defesa: |
Santos, Jos?? Eduardo de Oliveira,
Pansarelli, Daniel,
Del Vecchio, Angelo,
Gomes, Manuel Tavares,
Carvalho, Celso do Prado Ferraz de |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Nove de Julho
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de P??s-Gradua????o em Educa????o
|
Departamento: |
Educa????o
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Palavras-chave em Espanhol: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/1724
|
Resumo: |
The contexts of industrial-urban development from the last decades of the nineteenth century to the first of the twentieth century strongly marked the constitution and the debate about the creation of university institutions in the country. With the establishment of higher education by the university, the neoliberal context in which Brazil was inserted, based on the logic of markets and the corresponding culture of capitalism, the country became hostage to international parameters of regulation and evaluation defined from the centers of the accumulation system. As part of the result, we experience the exclusion of broader sectors of society. In higher education this is latent when we analyze the opportunities of access and permanence in public universities. From this scenario, proposals of institutions with an anti-hegemonic bias have arisen, regarding epistemological aspects and inclusion policies, among them the Federal University of the South Frontier, whose model presents itself as proposal of implantation and valorization of this project. In this sense, Obeduc-Capes / Uninove aimed to study the institutional matrices and the organizational structure of the recent universities created at the beginning of the 21st century in Brazil, in order to differentiate them from the traditional higher education models that historically influenced the organization of the sector in the country: Napoleonic, Humboldtian, American. By triangulating the data collected from the UFFS documents, the interviews with the managers and the answers of the university students, the research sought to verify if this federal institution constitutes a popular university and what the political-institutional and pedagogical challenges for its implantation. It consisted of a field research, of quantiqualitative analysis from the technique of categorization according to the one advocated by Content Analysis. Comparing the popular education propositions of the researchers representing our theoretical references, the documentary data that affirmed the UFFS popular project, the positions of the managers on the challenges faced with the implementation of this project and the students' perceptions about the popular nature of this model in construction, the dimensions of management, inclusion, assessment of learning and curriculum matrix were used for the exposition and confirmation of the conjecture presented. We consider the project of a self-declared university popular, even though it is not full, in the way of the realization by the advance in the attendance to the dimensions here researched and it shows an innovative proposal for the superior education of the 21st century. |