Câncer da mama-estudo retrospectivo e comparativo do perfil epidemiológico das pacientes em três diferentes faixas etárias

• Ano de defesa: 1998
• Autor(a) principal: Perea, Silvia Aparecida
• Orientador(a): Oliani, Antonio Hélio
• Banca de defesa: Burdmann, Emmanuel de Almeida , Barros, Alfredo Carlos Simões Dornellas de
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde
• Departamento: Medicina Interna; Medicina e Ciências Correlatas
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Câncer da mama; Epidemiologia; Idade; Neoplasias Mamárias; Estudos Retrospectivos; Estudos Epidemiológicos
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Breast Neoplasm; Retrospective Studies; Epidemiologic Studies; Breast Cancer; Epidemiology; Age
• Palavras-chave em Espanhol: Neoplasmas de la Mama; Estudios Retrospectivos; Estudios Epidemiológicos
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA::CLINICA MEDICA::GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA
• Link de acesso: http://bdtd.famerp.br/handle/tede/241

A retrospective study in patients carriers of breast cancer was performed during the period of January, 1993 to December, 1997. Two hundred nineteen cases were diagnosed and divided in three groups according to the age group: under age 40 (35 cases or 16%), 41 to 60 years old (116 cases or 53%) and the age of 61 or more (68 cases or 31%). The aim of this study was to check breast cancer prevalence among young women (under age 40) and analyze epidemiologic data among the groups, comparing with the literature. The following parameters showed significant results: marital status, origin, profession, age of menarche, number of gestation and pregnancies, contraceptive method and findings of phisical exams. Race, menstrual cycle, number of abortion, age of the first livebirth, cigarette smoking, fat intake, corporal weight, family and personal history, clinical stadium and histopathological exams showed no significant results. Based on those results, it was concluded that young patients compared to older ones, did not present significant differences in the data analysis and also according to the literature they were not adjusted in that epidemiologic profile classically described.