Análise de poder nas plataformas de participação digital e a influência em políticas públicas

• Ano de defesa: 2018
• Autor(a) principal: Coelho, Taiane Ritta
• Orientador(a): Cunha, Maria Alexandra Viegas Cortez da, Pozzebon, Marlei
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Palavras-chave em Português: Plataformas de participação digital; Políticas públicas; Poder na prática e na posse
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: eParticipation; Public policy; Possession and practice perspective of power; Resourcing
• Link de acesso: https://hdl.handle.net/10438/20285

This study aims to explain how power is manifested in the use of digital participation platforms to influence public policy. ICT tools implemented to promote e-Participation present new opportunities for dialogue between government and citizens. However, increasing participation through platforms remains a challenge. A fundamental problem in this context is the lack of considerations regarding possible changes in the balance between internal activities in the government and policy formulation issues. This thesis addresses this question based on the assumption that power is a mediator in this process. Paying greater attention to power could aid the conception and implementation of processes that are more representative, inclusive and impartial, leading to greater autonomy within a democratic system. The study was conducted through retrospective and comparative case studies, using the process analysis of participation platforms for the drafting of three public policies in important cities of the country (participation platform for the drafting of the PlanMob/SP 2015 in São Paulo, PMUS 2015 in Rio de Janeiro and the PlanoDiretor 2014 in Curitiba). The study was based on a number of data sources, such as semi-structured interviews, documentation and non-participation observation, analyzed using visual mapping and encoding techniques. The results show that the different actors display power on the platform through the possession of critical resources and formal authority, but also through resourcing. Three phases of resourcing emerged: resourcing in, resourcing within, and resourcing out. Based on the findings, I present a model that explains the process, in which, through participation, resources are created and distributed. The use of these resources generates changes in participation practices and in the establishment of mechanisms used to influence public policy. This interplay between the use of resources and the generation of mechanisms of influence affects the course of participation, leading to different results, including legitimacy, moderate influence or influence on public policy and learning with regard to the e-Participation process. It is also argued that the mobilization of resourcing in the practices that precede the participation in the platform, such as alliances and political support, have consequences in the drives the influence in the public policy. The union between technical and collective knowledge (resourcing within) is a source of power that interferes with the result. This study contributes to the literature on e-Participation by expanding knowledge on the antecedents, practices and results in the electronic participation process. It also enriches the literature on Resourcing, providing a further explanation of resourcing as a source of power, exploring the discussion on the resource space as an important aspect of power relationships and expanding the typology of resources in the digital participation process.