Teto como prática de inovação social

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: Schutz, Evandro Marcio
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Palavras-chave em Português: Desenvolvimento social; Inovação social; Sociedade civil; Emancipação social; Autonomia
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/2933

The Civil Society come starring a significant move in the construction of autonomy and emancipation of society. Given this scenario, there is a need of innovation applied to social sector called social innovation where citizens went from a passive approach to social actors. The aim of this study was to examine whether the implementation of an intervention model focused on community development, through the construction of emergency housing, social empowerment programs and networking is a practice of social innovation. The methodological procedures were defined from the general and specific objective, the research paradigm is interpretive, the approach set out for this study is qualitative, as the approach is descriptive in relation to the procedures a case study was performed. Data collection took place from interviews with semi-structured, participant observation and document analysis. The main reference model used to analyze the categories was Tardif and Harrison (2005), which is already a recognized model in the scientific area and it was built from case studies by CRISES. The main results were: the analysis project TETO meets the theoretical and practical principles of social innovation, as the results show a large part of the elements of social innovation dimensions described in the Tardif and Harrisson model (2005) that guided this study. The scale of transformation, dimension of innovativeness dimension of innovation, scale processes meets the necessary requirements of social innovations. The research identified the TETO projects results in social and community housing; aid to households and services to residents; social inclusion; fight against poverty; innovations institutional network - health care and welfare, solidarity cooperatives; innovative environments as local networks of cooperation and exchange; rural and urban revitalization; local mobilizations; empowerment of local stakeholders; training of local leaders with the participation of civil society. The size of actors serves partially as not logged in partnership with institutional actors (State). also attended the features and concepts of social innovation models of different authors in the literature that were also listed in the project as in the case of autonomy, social emancipation and social transformation. Research involving social innovations are gaining more and more space in the academies thus strengthening the scientific interest in building theories that come from meeting the essential needs of human beings to live in community.