Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fernandes, B. C. S. [UNESP]
Publication Date: 2014
Other Authors: Martins, M. R. F. B. [UNESP], Mendes, A. A. [UNESP], Milbradt, E. L. [UNESP], Sanfelice, C. [UNESP], Martins, B. B. [UNESP], Aguiar, E. F. [UNESP], Bresne, C. [UNESP]
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2014000400012&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129929
Summary: This study aimed at evaluating the intestinal integrity, using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the performance of broiler chickens fed additives alternative to antimicrobials. A total of 1080 male chicks were distributed according to a completely randomized experimental design, with six treatments with six replicates of 30 birds each. The following treatments were evaluated: basal diet (control), basal diet supplemented with an antimicrobial, basal diet supplemented with a probiotic, basal diet supplemented with a prebiotic, basal diet with a symbiotic, and basal diet supplemented with organic acids. Weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and livability were recorded when broiler chickens were 10, 21, 35, and 42 days old. On day 42, 72 birds were individually weighed and sacrificed. In order to evaluate the morphometrics of the different intestinal wall layers, segments of the small intestine and the cecum were collected from two birds per replicate, and intestinal integrity (SEM) was evaluated in the same segments of two birds per treatment. During the starter period (1-21 days old), birds fed the alternative additives presented similar weight gain as those fed the antimicrobial product, but were not different from control birds. Feed conversion ratio of birds fed alternative additives was better than that of the control birds from one to 10 days of age, but not during the remaining rearing period, and was similar to the birds receiving the antimicrobial. The morphometric parameters of the different intestinal wall layers was not influenced by the treatments. During the total rearing period, the evaluated alternative additives did not improve intestinal integrity or broiler performance.
id UNSP_cc59be7975b8bd1943d3e72992cda0ac
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/129929
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acidScanning electron microscopyMorphometricsIntestinal mucosaIntestinal wallThis study aimed at evaluating the intestinal integrity, using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the performance of broiler chickens fed additives alternative to antimicrobials. A total of 1080 male chicks were distributed according to a completely randomized experimental design, with six treatments with six replicates of 30 birds each. The following treatments were evaluated: basal diet (control), basal diet supplemented with an antimicrobial, basal diet supplemented with a probiotic, basal diet supplemented with a prebiotic, basal diet with a symbiotic, and basal diet supplemented with organic acids. Weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and livability were recorded when broiler chickens were 10, 21, 35, and 42 days old. On day 42, 72 birds were individually weighed and sacrificed. In order to evaluate the morphometrics of the different intestinal wall layers, segments of the small intestine and the cecum were collected from two birds per replicate, and intestinal integrity (SEM) was evaluated in the same segments of two birds per treatment. During the starter period (1-21 days old), birds fed the alternative additives presented similar weight gain as those fed the antimicrobial product, but were not different from control birds. Feed conversion ratio of birds fed alternative additives was better than that of the control birds from one to 10 days of age, but not during the remaining rearing period, and was similar to the birds receiving the antimicrobial. The morphometric parameters of the different intestinal wall layers was not influenced by the treatments. During the total rearing period, the evaluated alternative additives did not improve intestinal integrity or broiler performance.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Sao Paulo State Univ, Sch Vet Med &Anim Sci, Dept Anim Prod, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Anat, Biosci Inst, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Vet Clin, Sch Vet Med &Anim Sci, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Sch Vet Med &Anim Sci, Dept Anim Prod, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Anat, Biosci Inst, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Vet Clin, Sch Vet Med &Anim Sci, Botucatu, SP, BrazilFacta-fundacio Arnco Ciencia Tecnologia AvicolasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Fernandes, B. C. S. [UNESP]Martins, M. R. F. B. [UNESP]Mendes, A. A. [UNESP]Milbradt, E. L. [UNESP]Sanfelice, C. [UNESP]Martins, B. B. [UNESP]Aguiar, E. F. [UNESP]Bresne, C. [UNESP]2015-11-03T15:27:52Z2015-11-03T15:27:52Z2014-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article417-424application/pdfhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2014000400012&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=enBrazilian Journal Of Poultry Science. Campinas: Facta-fundacio Arnco Ciencia Tecnologia Avicolas, v. 16, n. 4, p. 417-424, 2014.1516-635Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/12992910.1590/1516-635x1604417-424S1516-635X2014000400012WOS:000348143900012S1516-635X2014000400012.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Journal Of Poultry Science0.463info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-10-07T18:53:02Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/129929Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-10-07T18:53:02Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
title Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
spellingShingle Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
Fernandes, B. C. S. [UNESP]
Scanning electron microscopy
Morphometrics
Intestinal mucosa
Intestinal wall
title_short Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
title_full Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
title_fullStr Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
title_full_unstemmed Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
title_sort Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
author Fernandes, B. C. S. [UNESP]
author_facet Fernandes, B. C. S. [UNESP]
Martins, M. R. F. B. [UNESP]
Mendes, A. A. [UNESP]
Milbradt, E. L. [UNESP]
Sanfelice, C. [UNESP]
Martins, B. B. [UNESP]
Aguiar, E. F. [UNESP]
Bresne, C. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Martins, M. R. F. B. [UNESP]
Mendes, A. A. [UNESP]
Milbradt, E. L. [UNESP]
Sanfelice, C. [UNESP]
Martins, B. B. [UNESP]
Aguiar, E. F. [UNESP]
Bresne, C. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, B. C. S. [UNESP]
Martins, M. R. F. B. [UNESP]
Mendes, A. A. [UNESP]
Milbradt, E. L. [UNESP]
Sanfelice, C. [UNESP]
Martins, B. B. [UNESP]
Aguiar, E. F. [UNESP]
Bresne, C. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Scanning electron microscopy
Morphometrics
Intestinal mucosa
Intestinal wall
topic Scanning electron microscopy
Morphometrics
Intestinal mucosa
Intestinal wall
description This study aimed at evaluating the intestinal integrity, using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the performance of broiler chickens fed additives alternative to antimicrobials. A total of 1080 male chicks were distributed according to a completely randomized experimental design, with six treatments with six replicates of 30 birds each. The following treatments were evaluated: basal diet (control), basal diet supplemented with an antimicrobial, basal diet supplemented with a probiotic, basal diet supplemented with a prebiotic, basal diet with a symbiotic, and basal diet supplemented with organic acids. Weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and livability were recorded when broiler chickens were 10, 21, 35, and 42 days old. On day 42, 72 birds were individually weighed and sacrificed. In order to evaluate the morphometrics of the different intestinal wall layers, segments of the small intestine and the cecum were collected from two birds per replicate, and intestinal integrity (SEM) was evaluated in the same segments of two birds per treatment. During the starter period (1-21 days old), birds fed the alternative additives presented similar weight gain as those fed the antimicrobial product, but were not different from control birds. Feed conversion ratio of birds fed alternative additives was better than that of the control birds from one to 10 days of age, but not during the remaining rearing period, and was similar to the birds receiving the antimicrobial. The morphometric parameters of the different intestinal wall layers was not influenced by the treatments. During the total rearing period, the evaluated alternative additives did not improve intestinal integrity or broiler performance.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-10-01
2015-11-03T15:27:52Z
2015-11-03T15:27:52Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2014000400012&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
Brazilian Journal Of Poultry Science. Campinas: Facta-fundacio Arnco Ciencia Tecnologia Avicolas, v. 16, n. 4, p. 417-424, 2014.
1516-635X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129929
10.1590/1516-635x1604417-424
S1516-635X2014000400012
WOS:000348143900012
S1516-635X2014000400012.pdf
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2014000400012&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129929
identifier_str_mv Brazilian Journal Of Poultry Science. Campinas: Facta-fundacio Arnco Ciencia Tecnologia Avicolas, v. 16, n. 4, p. 417-424, 2014.
1516-635X
10.1590/1516-635x1604417-424
S1516-635X2014000400012
WOS:000348143900012
S1516-635X2014000400012.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal Of Poultry Science
0.463
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 417-424
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Facta-fundacio Arnco Ciencia Tecnologia Avicolas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Facta-fundacio Arnco Ciencia Tecnologia Avicolas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834483763214548992