Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2014 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Download full: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2014000400012&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129929 |
Summary: | This study aimed at evaluating the intestinal integrity, using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the performance of broiler chickens fed additives alternative to antimicrobials. A total of 1080 male chicks were distributed according to a completely randomized experimental design, with six treatments with six replicates of 30 birds each. The following treatments were evaluated: basal diet (control), basal diet supplemented with an antimicrobial, basal diet supplemented with a probiotic, basal diet supplemented with a prebiotic, basal diet with a symbiotic, and basal diet supplemented with organic acids. Weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and livability were recorded when broiler chickens were 10, 21, 35, and 42 days old. On day 42, 72 birds were individually weighed and sacrificed. In order to evaluate the morphometrics of the different intestinal wall layers, segments of the small intestine and the cecum were collected from two birds per replicate, and intestinal integrity (SEM) was evaluated in the same segments of two birds per treatment. During the starter period (1-21 days old), birds fed the alternative additives presented similar weight gain as those fed the antimicrobial product, but were not different from control birds. Feed conversion ratio of birds fed alternative additives was better than that of the control birds from one to 10 days of age, but not during the remaining rearing period, and was similar to the birds receiving the antimicrobial. The morphometric parameters of the different intestinal wall layers was not influenced by the treatments. During the total rearing period, the evaluated alternative additives did not improve intestinal integrity or broiler performance. |
id |
UNSP_cc59be7975b8bd1943d3e72992cda0ac |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/129929 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acidScanning electron microscopyMorphometricsIntestinal mucosaIntestinal wallThis study aimed at evaluating the intestinal integrity, using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the performance of broiler chickens fed additives alternative to antimicrobials. A total of 1080 male chicks were distributed according to a completely randomized experimental design, with six treatments with six replicates of 30 birds each. The following treatments were evaluated: basal diet (control), basal diet supplemented with an antimicrobial, basal diet supplemented with a probiotic, basal diet supplemented with a prebiotic, basal diet with a symbiotic, and basal diet supplemented with organic acids. Weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and livability were recorded when broiler chickens were 10, 21, 35, and 42 days old. On day 42, 72 birds were individually weighed and sacrificed. In order to evaluate the morphometrics of the different intestinal wall layers, segments of the small intestine and the cecum were collected from two birds per replicate, and intestinal integrity (SEM) was evaluated in the same segments of two birds per treatment. During the starter period (1-21 days old), birds fed the alternative additives presented similar weight gain as those fed the antimicrobial product, but were not different from control birds. Feed conversion ratio of birds fed alternative additives was better than that of the control birds from one to 10 days of age, but not during the remaining rearing period, and was similar to the birds receiving the antimicrobial. The morphometric parameters of the different intestinal wall layers was not influenced by the treatments. During the total rearing period, the evaluated alternative additives did not improve intestinal integrity or broiler performance.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Sao Paulo State Univ, Sch Vet Med &Anim Sci, Dept Anim Prod, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Anat, Biosci Inst, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Vet Clin, Sch Vet Med &Anim Sci, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Sch Vet Med &Anim Sci, Dept Anim Prod, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Anat, Biosci Inst, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Vet Clin, Sch Vet Med &Anim Sci, Botucatu, SP, BrazilFacta-fundacio Arnco Ciencia Tecnologia AvicolasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Fernandes, B. C. S. [UNESP]Martins, M. R. F. B. [UNESP]Mendes, A. A. [UNESP]Milbradt, E. L. [UNESP]Sanfelice, C. [UNESP]Martins, B. B. [UNESP]Aguiar, E. F. [UNESP]Bresne, C. [UNESP]2015-11-03T15:27:52Z2015-11-03T15:27:52Z2014-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article417-424application/pdfhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2014000400012&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=enBrazilian Journal Of Poultry Science. Campinas: Facta-fundacio Arnco Ciencia Tecnologia Avicolas, v. 16, n. 4, p. 417-424, 2014.1516-635Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/12992910.1590/1516-635x1604417-424S1516-635X2014000400012WOS:000348143900012S1516-635X2014000400012.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Journal Of Poultry Science0.463info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-10-07T18:53:02Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/129929Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-10-07T18:53:02Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid |
title |
Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid |
spellingShingle |
Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid Fernandes, B. C. S. [UNESP] Scanning electron microscopy Morphometrics Intestinal mucosa Intestinal wall |
title_short |
Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid |
title_full |
Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid |
title_fullStr |
Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid |
title_sort |
Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid |
author |
Fernandes, B. C. S. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Fernandes, B. C. S. [UNESP] Martins, M. R. F. B. [UNESP] Mendes, A. A. [UNESP] Milbradt, E. L. [UNESP] Sanfelice, C. [UNESP] Martins, B. B. [UNESP] Aguiar, E. F. [UNESP] Bresne, C. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins, M. R. F. B. [UNESP] Mendes, A. A. [UNESP] Milbradt, E. L. [UNESP] Sanfelice, C. [UNESP] Martins, B. B. [UNESP] Aguiar, E. F. [UNESP] Bresne, C. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, B. C. S. [UNESP] Martins, M. R. F. B. [UNESP] Mendes, A. A. [UNESP] Milbradt, E. L. [UNESP] Sanfelice, C. [UNESP] Martins, B. B. [UNESP] Aguiar, E. F. [UNESP] Bresne, C. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Scanning electron microscopy Morphometrics Intestinal mucosa Intestinal wall |
topic |
Scanning electron microscopy Morphometrics Intestinal mucosa Intestinal wall |
description |
This study aimed at evaluating the intestinal integrity, using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the performance of broiler chickens fed additives alternative to antimicrobials. A total of 1080 male chicks were distributed according to a completely randomized experimental design, with six treatments with six replicates of 30 birds each. The following treatments were evaluated: basal diet (control), basal diet supplemented with an antimicrobial, basal diet supplemented with a probiotic, basal diet supplemented with a prebiotic, basal diet with a symbiotic, and basal diet supplemented with organic acids. Weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and livability were recorded when broiler chickens were 10, 21, 35, and 42 days old. On day 42, 72 birds were individually weighed and sacrificed. In order to evaluate the morphometrics of the different intestinal wall layers, segments of the small intestine and the cecum were collected from two birds per replicate, and intestinal integrity (SEM) was evaluated in the same segments of two birds per treatment. During the starter period (1-21 days old), birds fed the alternative additives presented similar weight gain as those fed the antimicrobial product, but were not different from control birds. Feed conversion ratio of birds fed alternative additives was better than that of the control birds from one to 10 days of age, but not during the remaining rearing period, and was similar to the birds receiving the antimicrobial. The morphometric parameters of the different intestinal wall layers was not influenced by the treatments. During the total rearing period, the evaluated alternative additives did not improve intestinal integrity or broiler performance. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-10-01 2015-11-03T15:27:52Z 2015-11-03T15:27:52Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2014000400012&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en Brazilian Journal Of Poultry Science. Campinas: Facta-fundacio Arnco Ciencia Tecnologia Avicolas, v. 16, n. 4, p. 417-424, 2014. 1516-635X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129929 10.1590/1516-635x1604417-424 S1516-635X2014000400012 WOS:000348143900012 S1516-635X2014000400012.pdf |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2014000400012&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129929 |
identifier_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal Of Poultry Science. Campinas: Facta-fundacio Arnco Ciencia Tecnologia Avicolas, v. 16, n. 4, p. 417-424, 2014. 1516-635X 10.1590/1516-635x1604417-424 S1516-635X2014000400012 WOS:000348143900012 S1516-635X2014000400012.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal Of Poultry Science 0.463 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
417-424 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Facta-fundacio Arnco Ciencia Tecnologia Avicolas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Facta-fundacio Arnco Ciencia Tecnologia Avicolas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1834483763214548992 |