Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fernandes,BCS
Publication Date: 2014
Other Authors: Martins,MRFB, Mendes,AA, Milbradt,EL, Sanfelice,C, Martins,BB, Aguiar,EF, Bresne,C
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2014000400012
Summary: This study aimed at evaluating the intestinal integrity, using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the performance of broiler chickens fed additives alternative to antimicrobials. A total of 1080 male chicks were distributed according to a completely randomized experimental design, with six treatments with six replicates of 30 birds each. The following treatments were evaluated: basal diet (control), basal diet supplemented with an antimicrobial, basal diet supplemented with a probiotic, basal diet supplemented with a prebiotic, basal diet with a symbiotic, and basal diet supplemented with organic acids. Weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and livability were recorded when broiler chickens were 10, 21, 35, and 42 days old. On day 42, 72 birds were individually weighed and sacrificed. In order to evaluate the morphometrics of the different intestinal wall layers, segments of the small intestine and the cecum were collected from two birds per replicate, and intestinal integrity (SEM) was evaluated in the same segments of two birds per treatment. During the starter period (1-21 days old), birds fed the alternative additives presented similar weight gain as those fed the antimicrobial product, but were not different from control birds. Feed conversion ratio of birds fed alternative additives was better than that of the control birds from one to 10 days of age, but not during the remaining rearing period, and was similar to the birds receiving the antimicrobial. The morphometric parameters of the different intestinal wall layers was not influenced by the treatments. During the total rearing period, the evaluated alternative additives did not improve intestinal integrity or broiler performance.
id FACTA-1_e98c347ac74b93d88f056f47a931ef70
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-635X2014000400012
network_acronym_str FACTA-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acidScanning electron microscopymorphometricsintestinal mucosaintestinal wallThis study aimed at evaluating the intestinal integrity, using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the performance of broiler chickens fed additives alternative to antimicrobials. A total of 1080 male chicks were distributed according to a completely randomized experimental design, with six treatments with six replicates of 30 birds each. The following treatments were evaluated: basal diet (control), basal diet supplemented with an antimicrobial, basal diet supplemented with a probiotic, basal diet supplemented with a prebiotic, basal diet with a symbiotic, and basal diet supplemented with organic acids. Weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and livability were recorded when broiler chickens were 10, 21, 35, and 42 days old. On day 42, 72 birds were individually weighed and sacrificed. In order to evaluate the morphometrics of the different intestinal wall layers, segments of the small intestine and the cecum were collected from two birds per replicate, and intestinal integrity (SEM) was evaluated in the same segments of two birds per treatment. During the starter period (1-21 days old), birds fed the alternative additives presented similar weight gain as those fed the antimicrobial product, but were not different from control birds. Feed conversion ratio of birds fed alternative additives was better than that of the control birds from one to 10 days of age, but not during the remaining rearing period, and was similar to the birds receiving the antimicrobial. The morphometric parameters of the different intestinal wall layers was not influenced by the treatments. During the total rearing period, the evaluated alternative additives did not improve intestinal integrity or broiler performance.Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas2014-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2014000400012Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.16 n.4 2014reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)instacron:FACTA10.1590/1516-635X1604417-424info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes,BCSMartins,MRFBMendes,AAMilbradt,ELSanfelice,CMartins,BBAguiar,EFBresne,Ceng2015-01-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-635X2014000400012Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbcahttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rvfacta@terra.com.br1806-90611516-635Xopendoar:2015-01-06T00:00Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
title Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
spellingShingle Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
Fernandes,BCS
Scanning electron microscopy
morphometrics
intestinal mucosa
intestinal wall
title_short Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
title_full Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
title_fullStr Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
title_full_unstemmed Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
title_sort Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid
author Fernandes,BCS
author_facet Fernandes,BCS
Martins,MRFB
Mendes,AA
Milbradt,EL
Sanfelice,C
Martins,BB
Aguiar,EF
Bresne,C
author_role author
author2 Martins,MRFB
Mendes,AA
Milbradt,EL
Sanfelice,C
Martins,BB
Aguiar,EF
Bresne,C
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes,BCS
Martins,MRFB
Mendes,AA
Milbradt,EL
Sanfelice,C
Martins,BB
Aguiar,EF
Bresne,C
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Scanning electron microscopy
morphometrics
intestinal mucosa
intestinal wall
topic Scanning electron microscopy
morphometrics
intestinal mucosa
intestinal wall
description This study aimed at evaluating the intestinal integrity, using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the performance of broiler chickens fed additives alternative to antimicrobials. A total of 1080 male chicks were distributed according to a completely randomized experimental design, with six treatments with six replicates of 30 birds each. The following treatments were evaluated: basal diet (control), basal diet supplemented with an antimicrobial, basal diet supplemented with a probiotic, basal diet supplemented with a prebiotic, basal diet with a symbiotic, and basal diet supplemented with organic acids. Weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and livability were recorded when broiler chickens were 10, 21, 35, and 42 days old. On day 42, 72 birds were individually weighed and sacrificed. In order to evaluate the morphometrics of the different intestinal wall layers, segments of the small intestine and the cecum were collected from two birds per replicate, and intestinal integrity (SEM) was evaluated in the same segments of two birds per treatment. During the starter period (1-21 days old), birds fed the alternative additives presented similar weight gain as those fed the antimicrobial product, but were not different from control birds. Feed conversion ratio of birds fed alternative additives was better than that of the control birds from one to 10 days of age, but not during the remaining rearing period, and was similar to the birds receiving the antimicrobial. The morphometric parameters of the different intestinal wall layers was not influenced by the treatments. During the total rearing period, the evaluated alternative additives did not improve intestinal integrity or broiler performance.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2014000400012
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2014000400012
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-635X1604417-424
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.16 n.4 2014
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
instacron:FACTA
instname_str Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
instacron_str FACTA
institution FACTA
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rvfacta@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754122512674848768