Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic?
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Download full: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103618 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/309997 |
Summary: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the fatigue behavior of adhesively cemented machined and polished lithium disilicate discs and compare the influence of the resin cement viscosity used to bond the ceramics to dentin analog substrate. Disc-shaped specimens (n = 15, Ø = 12 mm; thickness = 1.3 mm) of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were prepared and divided according to processing and surface finishing (machining (M) – CEREC inLab; and polishing (P) – control) and cement viscosity (high (H) and low (L)). The specimens were treated with self-etching primer and adhesively cemented (Variolink N Base + High or Low viscosity catalyst, Ivoclar Vivadent) to dentin analog discs (Ø = 12 mm; thickness = 2.2 mm). The cemented assemblies were subjected to fatigue testing using a step-stress approach (500−1500 N; step-size of 100 N; 10,000 cycles per step; 20 Hz). Weibull statistics were conducted on fatigue data (95 % CI). Fractographic and topographic analyzes were also performed on a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Considering the same viscosity, machined groups presented statistically lower characteristic fatigue failure load (N) (FFL0 MH 1192 [1111–1278]; ML 1105 [1077–1134]) than their polished controls (FFL0 PH 1350 [1279–1424]; PL 1333 [1276–1392]). No differences were found between cement viscosities, regardless of surface characteristic. It is well known that CAD-CAM machining impairs mechanical performance of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. Adhesive cementation was not able to revert this negative impact, regardless of cement viscosity. Cement viscosity did not affect the fatigue results. |
id |
UNSP_a2ef0f1faadbe0c7d1f69e798d2d4afd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/309997 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic?CeramicsFatigueMillingResin composite cementsSurface roughness/morphologyThe aim of this study was to evaluate the fatigue behavior of adhesively cemented machined and polished lithium disilicate discs and compare the influence of the resin cement viscosity used to bond the ceramics to dentin analog substrate. Disc-shaped specimens (n = 15, Ø = 12 mm; thickness = 1.3 mm) of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were prepared and divided according to processing and surface finishing (machining (M) – CEREC inLab; and polishing (P) – control) and cement viscosity (high (H) and low (L)). The specimens were treated with self-etching primer and adhesively cemented (Variolink N Base + High or Low viscosity catalyst, Ivoclar Vivadent) to dentin analog discs (Ø = 12 mm; thickness = 2.2 mm). The cemented assemblies were subjected to fatigue testing using a step-stress approach (500−1500 N; step-size of 100 N; 10,000 cycles per step; 20 Hz). Weibull statistics were conducted on fatigue data (95 % CI). Fractographic and topographic analyzes were also performed on a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Considering the same viscosity, machined groups presented statistically lower characteristic fatigue failure load (N) (FFL0 MH 1192 [1111–1278]; ML 1105 [1077–1134]) than their polished controls (FFL0 PH 1350 [1279–1424]; PL 1333 [1276–1392]). No differences were found between cement viscosities, regardless of surface characteristic. It is well known that CAD-CAM machining impairs mechanical performance of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. Adhesive cementation was not able to revert this negative impact, regardless of cement viscosity. Cement viscosity did not affect the fatigue results.Post-Graduate Program in Dental Sciences Federal University of Santa Maria, RSDepartment of Conservative Dentistry Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, RSDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University, SPPost-Graduate Program in Dental Sciences Department of Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria, RSDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University, SPFederal University of Santa MariaFederal University of Rio Grande Do SulUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)May, Michele MirianMachry, Renan VazFraga, Sarade Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt [UNESP]Bottino, Marco Antônio [UNESP]Valandro, Luiz FelipeMay, Liliana Gressler2025-04-29T20:17:27Z2024-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103618International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, v. 130.0143-7496https://hdl.handle.net/11449/30999710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.1036182-s2.0-85182391970Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Adhesion and Adhesivesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-30T14:00:25Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/309997Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T14:00:25Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic? |
title |
Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic? |
spellingShingle |
Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic? May, Michele Mirian Ceramics Fatigue Milling Resin composite cements Surface roughness/morphology |
title_short |
Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic? |
title_full |
Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic? |
title_fullStr |
Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic? |
title_sort |
Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic? |
author |
May, Michele Mirian |
author_facet |
May, Michele Mirian Machry, Renan Vaz Fraga, Sara de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt [UNESP] Bottino, Marco Antônio [UNESP] Valandro, Luiz Felipe May, Liliana Gressler |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Machry, Renan Vaz Fraga, Sara de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt [UNESP] Bottino, Marco Antônio [UNESP] Valandro, Luiz Felipe May, Liliana Gressler |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Maria Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
May, Michele Mirian Machry, Renan Vaz Fraga, Sara de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt [UNESP] Bottino, Marco Antônio [UNESP] Valandro, Luiz Felipe May, Liliana Gressler |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ceramics Fatigue Milling Resin composite cements Surface roughness/morphology |
topic |
Ceramics Fatigue Milling Resin composite cements Surface roughness/morphology |
description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the fatigue behavior of adhesively cemented machined and polished lithium disilicate discs and compare the influence of the resin cement viscosity used to bond the ceramics to dentin analog substrate. Disc-shaped specimens (n = 15, Ø = 12 mm; thickness = 1.3 mm) of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were prepared and divided according to processing and surface finishing (machining (M) – CEREC inLab; and polishing (P) – control) and cement viscosity (high (H) and low (L)). The specimens were treated with self-etching primer and adhesively cemented (Variolink N Base + High or Low viscosity catalyst, Ivoclar Vivadent) to dentin analog discs (Ø = 12 mm; thickness = 2.2 mm). The cemented assemblies were subjected to fatigue testing using a step-stress approach (500−1500 N; step-size of 100 N; 10,000 cycles per step; 20 Hz). Weibull statistics were conducted on fatigue data (95 % CI). Fractographic and topographic analyzes were also performed on a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Considering the same viscosity, machined groups presented statistically lower characteristic fatigue failure load (N) (FFL0 MH 1192 [1111–1278]; ML 1105 [1077–1134]) than their polished controls (FFL0 PH 1350 [1279–1424]; PL 1333 [1276–1392]). No differences were found between cement viscosities, regardless of surface characteristic. It is well known that CAD-CAM machining impairs mechanical performance of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. Adhesive cementation was not able to revert this negative impact, regardless of cement viscosity. Cement viscosity did not affect the fatigue results. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-03-01 2025-04-29T20:17:27Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103618 International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, v. 130. 0143-7496 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/309997 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103618 2-s2.0-85182391970 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103618 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/309997 |
identifier_str_mv |
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, v. 130. 0143-7496 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103618 2-s2.0-85182391970 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1834482674258935808 |