Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic?

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: May, Michele Mirian
Publication Date: 2024
Other Authors: Machry, Renan Vaz, Fraga, Sara, de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt [UNESP], Bottino, Marco Antônio [UNESP], Valandro, Luiz Felipe, May, Liliana Gressler
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103618
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/309997
Summary: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fatigue behavior of adhesively cemented machined and polished lithium disilicate discs and compare the influence of the resin cement viscosity used to bond the ceramics to dentin analog substrate. Disc-shaped specimens (n = 15, Ø = 12 mm; thickness = 1.3 mm) of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were prepared and divided according to processing and surface finishing (machining (M) – CEREC inLab; and polishing (P) – control) and cement viscosity (high (H) and low (L)). The specimens were treated with self-etching primer and adhesively cemented (Variolink N Base + High or Low viscosity catalyst, Ivoclar Vivadent) to dentin analog discs (Ø = 12 mm; thickness = 2.2 mm). The cemented assemblies were subjected to fatigue testing using a step-stress approach (500−1500 N; step-size of 100 N; 10,000 cycles per step; 20 Hz). Weibull statistics were conducted on fatigue data (95 % CI). Fractographic and topographic analyzes were also performed on a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Considering the same viscosity, machined groups presented statistically lower characteristic fatigue failure load (N) (FFL0 MH 1192 [1111–1278]; ML 1105 [1077–1134]) than their polished controls (FFL0 PH 1350 [1279–1424]; PL 1333 [1276–1392]). No differences were found between cement viscosities, regardless of surface characteristic. It is well known that CAD-CAM machining impairs mechanical performance of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. Adhesive cementation was not able to revert this negative impact, regardless of cement viscosity. Cement viscosity did not affect the fatigue results.
id UNSP_a2ef0f1faadbe0c7d1f69e798d2d4afd
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/309997
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic?CeramicsFatigueMillingResin composite cementsSurface roughness/morphologyThe aim of this study was to evaluate the fatigue behavior of adhesively cemented machined and polished lithium disilicate discs and compare the influence of the resin cement viscosity used to bond the ceramics to dentin analog substrate. Disc-shaped specimens (n = 15, Ø = 12 mm; thickness = 1.3 mm) of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were prepared and divided according to processing and surface finishing (machining (M) – CEREC inLab; and polishing (P) – control) and cement viscosity (high (H) and low (L)). The specimens were treated with self-etching primer and adhesively cemented (Variolink N Base + High or Low viscosity catalyst, Ivoclar Vivadent) to dentin analog discs (Ø = 12 mm; thickness = 2.2 mm). The cemented assemblies were subjected to fatigue testing using a step-stress approach (500−1500 N; step-size of 100 N; 10,000 cycles per step; 20 Hz). Weibull statistics were conducted on fatigue data (95 % CI). Fractographic and topographic analyzes were also performed on a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Considering the same viscosity, machined groups presented statistically lower characteristic fatigue failure load (N) (FFL0 MH 1192 [1111–1278]; ML 1105 [1077–1134]) than their polished controls (FFL0 PH 1350 [1279–1424]; PL 1333 [1276–1392]). No differences were found between cement viscosities, regardless of surface characteristic. It is well known that CAD-CAM machining impairs mechanical performance of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. Adhesive cementation was not able to revert this negative impact, regardless of cement viscosity. Cement viscosity did not affect the fatigue results.Post-Graduate Program in Dental Sciences Federal University of Santa Maria, RSDepartment of Conservative Dentistry Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, RSDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University, SPPost-Graduate Program in Dental Sciences Department of Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria, RSDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University, SPFederal University of Santa MariaFederal University of Rio Grande Do SulUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)May, Michele MirianMachry, Renan VazFraga, Sarade Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt [UNESP]Bottino, Marco Antônio [UNESP]Valandro, Luiz FelipeMay, Liliana Gressler2025-04-29T20:17:27Z2024-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103618International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, v. 130.0143-7496https://hdl.handle.net/11449/30999710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.1036182-s2.0-85182391970Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Adhesion and Adhesivesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-30T14:00:25Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/309997Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T14:00:25Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic?
title Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic?
spellingShingle Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic?
May, Michele Mirian
Ceramics
Fatigue
Milling
Resin composite cements
Surface roughness/morphology
title_short Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic?
title_full Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic?
title_fullStr Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic?
title_full_unstemmed Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic?
title_sort Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic?
author May, Michele Mirian
author_facet May, Michele Mirian
Machry, Renan Vaz
Fraga, Sara
de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt [UNESP]
Bottino, Marco Antônio [UNESP]
Valandro, Luiz Felipe
May, Liliana Gressler
author_role author
author2 Machry, Renan Vaz
Fraga, Sara
de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt [UNESP]
Bottino, Marco Antônio [UNESP]
Valandro, Luiz Felipe
May, Liliana Gressler
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Maria
Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv May, Michele Mirian
Machry, Renan Vaz
Fraga, Sara
de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt [UNESP]
Bottino, Marco Antônio [UNESP]
Valandro, Luiz Felipe
May, Liliana Gressler
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ceramics
Fatigue
Milling
Resin composite cements
Surface roughness/morphology
topic Ceramics
Fatigue
Milling
Resin composite cements
Surface roughness/morphology
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the fatigue behavior of adhesively cemented machined and polished lithium disilicate discs and compare the influence of the resin cement viscosity used to bond the ceramics to dentin analog substrate. Disc-shaped specimens (n = 15, Ø = 12 mm; thickness = 1.3 mm) of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were prepared and divided according to processing and surface finishing (machining (M) – CEREC inLab; and polishing (P) – control) and cement viscosity (high (H) and low (L)). The specimens were treated with self-etching primer and adhesively cemented (Variolink N Base + High or Low viscosity catalyst, Ivoclar Vivadent) to dentin analog discs (Ø = 12 mm; thickness = 2.2 mm). The cemented assemblies were subjected to fatigue testing using a step-stress approach (500−1500 N; step-size of 100 N; 10,000 cycles per step; 20 Hz). Weibull statistics were conducted on fatigue data (95 % CI). Fractographic and topographic analyzes were also performed on a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Considering the same viscosity, machined groups presented statistically lower characteristic fatigue failure load (N) (FFL0 MH 1192 [1111–1278]; ML 1105 [1077–1134]) than their polished controls (FFL0 PH 1350 [1279–1424]; PL 1333 [1276–1392]). No differences were found between cement viscosities, regardless of surface characteristic. It is well known that CAD-CAM machining impairs mechanical performance of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. Adhesive cementation was not able to revert this negative impact, regardless of cement viscosity. Cement viscosity did not affect the fatigue results.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-01
2025-04-29T20:17:27Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103618
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, v. 130.
0143-7496
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/309997
10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103618
2-s2.0-85182391970
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103618
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/309997
identifier_str_mv International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, v. 130.
0143-7496
10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103618
2-s2.0-85182391970
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834482674258935808