Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Warne, Leon N.
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Schug, Stephan A., Beths, Thierry, Brondani, Juliana T. [UNESP], Carter, Jennifer E., Lascelles, Duncan B.X., Raisis, Anthea L., Robertson, Sheilah A., Steagall, Paulo V.M., Taylor, Polly M., Whittem, Ted, Bauquier, Sébastien H.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000670
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221249
Summary: Introduction: This article reports the content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool designed to Review the quality of Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain and provide guidance as to the strengths and weakness of findings. The CATRAS quality items encompass 3 domains: level of evidence, methodological soundness, and grading of the pain assessment tool. Objectives: To validate a critical appraisal tool for reviewing analgesia studies involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain. Methods: Content validation was achieved using Delphi methodology through panel consensus. A panel of 6 experts reviewed the CATRAS in 3 rounds and quantitatively rated the relevance of the instrument and each of its quality items to their respective domains. Results: Content validation was achieved for each item of the CATRAS and the tool as a whole. Item-level content validity index and kappa coefficient were at least greater than 0.83 and 0.81, respectively, for all items except for one item in domain 2 that was later removed. Scale-level content validity index was 97% (excellent content validity). Conclusions: This 67-item critical appraisal tool may enable critical and quantitative assessment of the quality of individual analgesia trials involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain for use in systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies.
id UNSP_25a0d99b85cbf9a21b4407f6945b57e1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221249
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting painAnalgesiaCritical appraisal toolPainIntroduction: This article reports the content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool designed to Review the quality of Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain and provide guidance as to the strengths and weakness of findings. The CATRAS quality items encompass 3 domains: level of evidence, methodological soundness, and grading of the pain assessment tool. Objectives: To validate a critical appraisal tool for reviewing analgesia studies involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain. Methods: Content validation was achieved using Delphi methodology through panel consensus. A panel of 6 experts reviewed the CATRAS in 3 rounds and quantitatively rated the relevance of the instrument and each of its quality items to their respective domains. Results: Content validation was achieved for each item of the CATRAS and the tool as a whole. Item-level content validity index and kappa coefficient were at least greater than 0.83 and 0.81, respectively, for all items except for one item in domain 2 that was later removed. Scale-level content validity index was 97% (excellent content validity). Conclusions: This 67-item critical appraisal tool may enable critical and quantitative assessment of the quality of individual analgesia trials involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain for use in systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies.School of Veterinary and Life Sciences Murdoch UniversityMelbourne Veterinary School University of MelbourneDiscipline of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medical School University of Western AustraliaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine Royal Perth HospitalUniversidade Estadual PaulistaDepartment of Clinical Sciences Comparative Pain Research and Education Centre College of Veterinary Medicine North Carolina State UniversityComparative Medicine Institute College of Veterinary Medicine North Carolina State UniversityCenter for Pain Research and Innovation UNC School of DentistryDepartment of Anesthesiology Center for Translational Pain Research Duke UniversityLap of Love Veterinary Hospice In-Home EuthanasiaDepartment of Clinical Sciences Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Université de MontréalAnimal Pharmacology Research Group of Quebec (GREPAQ) Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Université de MontréalUniversidade Estadual PaulistaMurdoch UniversityUniversity of MelbourneUniversity of Western AustraliaRoyal Perth HospitalUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)North Carolina State UniversityUNC School of DentistryDuke UniversityIn-Home EuthanasiaUniversité de MontréalWarne, Leon N.Schug, Stephan A.Beths, ThierryBrondani, Juliana T. [UNESP]Carter, Jennifer E.Lascelles, Duncan B.X.Raisis, Anthea L.Robertson, Sheilah A.Steagall, Paulo V.M.Taylor, Polly M.Whittem, TedBauquier, Sébastien H.2022-04-28T19:27:00Z2022-04-28T19:27:00Z2018-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000670Pain Reports, v. 3, n. 4, 2018.2471-2531http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22124910.1097/PR9.00000000000006702-s2.0-85061497800Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPain Reportsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:27:00Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221249Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462022-04-28T19:27Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain
title Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain
spellingShingle Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain
Warne, Leon N.
Analgesia
Critical appraisal tool
Pain
title_short Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain
title_full Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain
title_fullStr Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain
title_full_unstemmed Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain
title_sort Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain
author Warne, Leon N.
author_facet Warne, Leon N.
Schug, Stephan A.
Beths, Thierry
Brondani, Juliana T. [UNESP]
Carter, Jennifer E.
Lascelles, Duncan B.X.
Raisis, Anthea L.
Robertson, Sheilah A.
Steagall, Paulo V.M.
Taylor, Polly M.
Whittem, Ted
Bauquier, Sébastien H.
author_role author
author2 Schug, Stephan A.
Beths, Thierry
Brondani, Juliana T. [UNESP]
Carter, Jennifer E.
Lascelles, Duncan B.X.
Raisis, Anthea L.
Robertson, Sheilah A.
Steagall, Paulo V.M.
Taylor, Polly M.
Whittem, Ted
Bauquier, Sébastien H.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Murdoch University
University of Melbourne
University of Western Australia
Royal Perth Hospital
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
North Carolina State University
UNC School of Dentistry
Duke University
In-Home Euthanasia
Université de Montréal
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Warne, Leon N.
Schug, Stephan A.
Beths, Thierry
Brondani, Juliana T. [UNESP]
Carter, Jennifer E.
Lascelles, Duncan B.X.
Raisis, Anthea L.
Robertson, Sheilah A.
Steagall, Paulo V.M.
Taylor, Polly M.
Whittem, Ted
Bauquier, Sébastien H.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Analgesia
Critical appraisal tool
Pain
topic Analgesia
Critical appraisal tool
Pain
description Introduction: This article reports the content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool designed to Review the quality of Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain and provide guidance as to the strengths and weakness of findings. The CATRAS quality items encompass 3 domains: level of evidence, methodological soundness, and grading of the pain assessment tool. Objectives: To validate a critical appraisal tool for reviewing analgesia studies involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain. Methods: Content validation was achieved using Delphi methodology through panel consensus. A panel of 6 experts reviewed the CATRAS in 3 rounds and quantitatively rated the relevance of the instrument and each of its quality items to their respective domains. Results: Content validation was achieved for each item of the CATRAS and the tool as a whole. Item-level content validity index and kappa coefficient were at least greater than 0.83 and 0.81, respectively, for all items except for one item in domain 2 that was later removed. Scale-level content validity index was 97% (excellent content validity). Conclusions: This 67-item critical appraisal tool may enable critical and quantitative assessment of the quality of individual analgesia trials involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain for use in systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-01
2022-04-28T19:27:00Z
2022-04-28T19:27:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000670
Pain Reports, v. 3, n. 4, 2018.
2471-2531
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221249
10.1097/PR9.0000000000000670
2-s2.0-85061497800
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000670
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221249
identifier_str_mv Pain Reports, v. 3, n. 4, 2018.
2471-2531
10.1097/PR9.0000000000000670
2-s2.0-85061497800
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Pain Reports
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834484438043459584