Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2018 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Download full: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000670 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221249 |
Summary: | Introduction: This article reports the content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool designed to Review the quality of Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain and provide guidance as to the strengths and weakness of findings. The CATRAS quality items encompass 3 domains: level of evidence, methodological soundness, and grading of the pain assessment tool. Objectives: To validate a critical appraisal tool for reviewing analgesia studies involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain. Methods: Content validation was achieved using Delphi methodology through panel consensus. A panel of 6 experts reviewed the CATRAS in 3 rounds and quantitatively rated the relevance of the instrument and each of its quality items to their respective domains. Results: Content validation was achieved for each item of the CATRAS and the tool as a whole. Item-level content validity index and kappa coefficient were at least greater than 0.83 and 0.81, respectively, for all items except for one item in domain 2 that was later removed. Scale-level content validity index was 97% (excellent content validity). Conclusions: This 67-item critical appraisal tool may enable critical and quantitative assessment of the quality of individual analgesia trials involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain for use in systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies. |
id |
UNSP_25a0d99b85cbf9a21b4407f6945b57e1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221249 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting painAnalgesiaCritical appraisal toolPainIntroduction: This article reports the content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool designed to Review the quality of Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain and provide guidance as to the strengths and weakness of findings. The CATRAS quality items encompass 3 domains: level of evidence, methodological soundness, and grading of the pain assessment tool. Objectives: To validate a critical appraisal tool for reviewing analgesia studies involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain. Methods: Content validation was achieved using Delphi methodology through panel consensus. A panel of 6 experts reviewed the CATRAS in 3 rounds and quantitatively rated the relevance of the instrument and each of its quality items to their respective domains. Results: Content validation was achieved for each item of the CATRAS and the tool as a whole. Item-level content validity index and kappa coefficient were at least greater than 0.83 and 0.81, respectively, for all items except for one item in domain 2 that was later removed. Scale-level content validity index was 97% (excellent content validity). Conclusions: This 67-item critical appraisal tool may enable critical and quantitative assessment of the quality of individual analgesia trials involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain for use in systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies.School of Veterinary and Life Sciences Murdoch UniversityMelbourne Veterinary School University of MelbourneDiscipline of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medical School University of Western AustraliaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine Royal Perth HospitalUniversidade Estadual PaulistaDepartment of Clinical Sciences Comparative Pain Research and Education Centre College of Veterinary Medicine North Carolina State UniversityComparative Medicine Institute College of Veterinary Medicine North Carolina State UniversityCenter for Pain Research and Innovation UNC School of DentistryDepartment of Anesthesiology Center for Translational Pain Research Duke UniversityLap of Love Veterinary Hospice In-Home EuthanasiaDepartment of Clinical Sciences Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Université de MontréalAnimal Pharmacology Research Group of Quebec (GREPAQ) Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Université de MontréalUniversidade Estadual PaulistaMurdoch UniversityUniversity of MelbourneUniversity of Western AustraliaRoyal Perth HospitalUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)North Carolina State UniversityUNC School of DentistryDuke UniversityIn-Home EuthanasiaUniversité de MontréalWarne, Leon N.Schug, Stephan A.Beths, ThierryBrondani, Juliana T. [UNESP]Carter, Jennifer E.Lascelles, Duncan B.X.Raisis, Anthea L.Robertson, Sheilah A.Steagall, Paulo V.M.Taylor, Polly M.Whittem, TedBauquier, Sébastien H.2022-04-28T19:27:00Z2022-04-28T19:27:00Z2018-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000670Pain Reports, v. 3, n. 4, 2018.2471-2531http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22124910.1097/PR9.00000000000006702-s2.0-85061497800Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPain Reportsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:27:00Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221249Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462022-04-28T19:27Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain |
title |
Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain |
spellingShingle |
Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain Warne, Leon N. Analgesia Critical appraisal tool Pain |
title_short |
Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain |
title_full |
Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain |
title_fullStr |
Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain |
title_full_unstemmed |
Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain |
title_sort |
Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain |
author |
Warne, Leon N. |
author_facet |
Warne, Leon N. Schug, Stephan A. Beths, Thierry Brondani, Juliana T. [UNESP] Carter, Jennifer E. Lascelles, Duncan B.X. Raisis, Anthea L. Robertson, Sheilah A. Steagall, Paulo V.M. Taylor, Polly M. Whittem, Ted Bauquier, Sébastien H. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schug, Stephan A. Beths, Thierry Brondani, Juliana T. [UNESP] Carter, Jennifer E. Lascelles, Duncan B.X. Raisis, Anthea L. Robertson, Sheilah A. Steagall, Paulo V.M. Taylor, Polly M. Whittem, Ted Bauquier, Sébastien H. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Murdoch University University of Melbourne University of Western Australia Royal Perth Hospital Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) North Carolina State University UNC School of Dentistry Duke University In-Home Euthanasia Université de Montréal |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Warne, Leon N. Schug, Stephan A. Beths, Thierry Brondani, Juliana T. [UNESP] Carter, Jennifer E. Lascelles, Duncan B.X. Raisis, Anthea L. Robertson, Sheilah A. Steagall, Paulo V.M. Taylor, Polly M. Whittem, Ted Bauquier, Sébastien H. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Analgesia Critical appraisal tool Pain |
topic |
Analgesia Critical appraisal tool Pain |
description |
Introduction: This article reports the content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool designed to Review the quality of Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain and provide guidance as to the strengths and weakness of findings. The CATRAS quality items encompass 3 domains: level of evidence, methodological soundness, and grading of the pain assessment tool. Objectives: To validate a critical appraisal tool for reviewing analgesia studies involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain. Methods: Content validation was achieved using Delphi methodology through panel consensus. A panel of 6 experts reviewed the CATRAS in 3 rounds and quantitatively rated the relevance of the instrument and each of its quality items to their respective domains. Results: Content validation was achieved for each item of the CATRAS and the tool as a whole. Item-level content validity index and kappa coefficient were at least greater than 0.83 and 0.81, respectively, for all items except for one item in domain 2 that was later removed. Scale-level content validity index was 97% (excellent content validity). Conclusions: This 67-item critical appraisal tool may enable critical and quantitative assessment of the quality of individual analgesia trials involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain for use in systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-01 2022-04-28T19:27:00Z 2022-04-28T19:27:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000670 Pain Reports, v. 3, n. 4, 2018. 2471-2531 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221249 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000670 2-s2.0-85061497800 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000670 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221249 |
identifier_str_mv |
Pain Reports, v. 3, n. 4, 2018. 2471-2531 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000670 2-s2.0-85061497800 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Pain Reports |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1834484438043459584 |