SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF SIGN LANGUAGE

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: PIVETTA, Elisa Maria
Publication Date: 2014
Other Authors: SAITO, Daniela Satomi, Silva FLOR, Carla da, PERASSI, Richard
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Acta Semiótica et Lingvistica (Online)
Download full: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/actas/article/view/18432
Summary: Thispaper discussses the iconicity and arbitrariness of sign language in Peirceanperspective. In this study, the semiotic concepts of Peirce (2005) areconsidered discussing the signification process and the difference betweenlanguage and speech. Then, the structural pathways of sign language areexplored, and classified as iconic and arbitrary. As results of discussion, itis considered that sign language just can be classified as iconic to someonewho not knows sign language, because for those who know, prevails conventionrecognition. Furthermore, there are classifiers, that are not conventionalizedsigns, and threfore are closer definition o Peirce’s definition of a icon,although having previous determined hands configuration.
id UFPB-10_ddfac49be052d15c613f2fef13a02373
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufpb.br:article/18432
network_acronym_str UFPB-10
network_name_str Acta Semiótica et Lingvistica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF SIGN LANGUAGEANÁLISE SEMIÓTICA DA LÍNGUA DE SINAISThispaper discussses the iconicity and arbitrariness of sign language in Peirceanperspective. In this study, the semiotic concepts of Peirce (2005) areconsidered discussing the signification process and the difference betweenlanguage and speech. Then, the structural pathways of sign language areexplored, and classified as iconic and arbitrary. As results of discussion, itis considered that sign language just can be classified as iconic to someonewho not knows sign language, because for those who know, prevails conventionrecognition. Furthermore, there are classifiers, that are not conventionalizedsigns, and threfore are closer definition o Peirce’s definition of a icon,although having previous determined hands configuration.Este artigo traz uma discussão a respeito da iconicidade earbitrariedade da língua de sinais sob a ótica peirceana. São considerados osconceitos semióticos da teoria de Peirce (2005), discorrendo sobre o processode significação e definição da diferença entre língua e linguagem. Em seguida,são exploradas as vias estruturais das línguas de sinais, classificadas emsinais icônicos e arbitrários. Como resultados da discussão, considera-se queos sinais só podem ser classificados como icônicos para alguém que não conhecea língua, porque para os que conhecem prevalece o reconhecimento da convenção.Além disso, há também os classificadores, que não são sinaisconvencionalizados, portanto estão mais próximos da definição de ícone porPeirce, apesar de terem configurações de mãos já previamente estabelecidas.Universidade Federal da Paraíba2014-03-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo não avaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/actas/article/view/18432Acta Semiotica et Lingvistica; v. 18, n. 2 (2013)Acta Semiotica et Lingvistica; v. 18, n. 2 (2013)Acta Semiotica et Lingvistica; v. 18, n. 2 (2013)Acta Semiotica et Lingvistica; v. 18, n. 2 (2013)Acta Semiótica et Lingvistica; v. 18, n. 2 (2013)2446-70060102-4264reponame:Acta Semiótica et Lingvistica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)instacron:UFPBporhttps://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/actas/article/view/18432/10361PIVETTA, Elisa MariaSAITO, Daniela SatomiSilva FLOR, Carla daPERASSI, Richardinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-10-24T16:37:50Zoai:periodicos.ufpb.br:article/18432Revistahttps://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/actasPUBhttps://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/actas/oai||mariadefatimambatista@gmail.com2446-70060102-4264opendoar:2019-10-24T16:37:50Acta Semiótica et Lingvistica (Online) - Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF SIGN LANGUAGE
ANÁLISE SEMIÓTICA DA LÍNGUA DE SINAIS
title SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF SIGN LANGUAGE
spellingShingle SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF SIGN LANGUAGE
PIVETTA, Elisa Maria
title_short SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF SIGN LANGUAGE
title_full SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF SIGN LANGUAGE
title_fullStr SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF SIGN LANGUAGE
title_full_unstemmed SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF SIGN LANGUAGE
title_sort SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF SIGN LANGUAGE
author PIVETTA, Elisa Maria
author_facet PIVETTA, Elisa Maria
SAITO, Daniela Satomi
Silva FLOR, Carla da
PERASSI, Richard
author_role author
author2 SAITO, Daniela Satomi
Silva FLOR, Carla da
PERASSI, Richard
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv PIVETTA, Elisa Maria
SAITO, Daniela Satomi
Silva FLOR, Carla da
PERASSI, Richard
description Thispaper discussses the iconicity and arbitrariness of sign language in Peirceanperspective. In this study, the semiotic concepts of Peirce (2005) areconsidered discussing the signification process and the difference betweenlanguage and speech. Then, the structural pathways of sign language areexplored, and classified as iconic and arbitrary. As results of discussion, itis considered that sign language just can be classified as iconic to someonewho not knows sign language, because for those who know, prevails conventionrecognition. Furthermore, there are classifiers, that are not conventionalizedsigns, and threfore are closer definition o Peirce’s definition of a icon,although having previous determined hands configuration.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-03-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo não avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/actas/article/view/18432
url https://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/actas/article/view/18432
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/actas/article/view/18432/10361
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Paraíba
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Paraíba
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Semiotica et Lingvistica; v. 18, n. 2 (2013)
Acta Semiotica et Lingvistica; v. 18, n. 2 (2013)
Acta Semiotica et Lingvistica; v. 18, n. 2 (2013)
Acta Semiotica et Lingvistica; v. 18, n. 2 (2013)
Acta Semiótica et Lingvistica; v. 18, n. 2 (2013)
2446-7006
0102-4264
reponame:Acta Semiótica et Lingvistica (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)
instacron:UFPB
instname_str Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)
instacron_str UFPB
institution UFPB
reponame_str Acta Semiótica et Lingvistica (Online)
collection Acta Semiótica et Lingvistica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Semiótica et Lingvistica (Online) - Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||mariadefatimambatista@gmail.com
_version_ 1830290822271074304