Pre-emergent herbicide screening for wheat

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Teixeira, Celso Augusto Sato
Publication Date: 2024
Other Authors: Witter, Ana Paula Werkhausen, Ferreira, Luiz Augusto Inojosa, Sanches, Ana Karoline silva, Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silvério de, Biffe, Denis Fernando
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Revista Caatinga
Download full: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11681
Summary: Weed control is a challenge in crop management due to the limited number of registered herbicides, especially for pre-emergent application. This study aimed to investigate the selectivity of pre-emergent herbicides with different mechanisms of action for wheat. The experiment consisted of two stages: the first involved screening under greenhouse conditions, and the second assessing the selected treatments under field conditions, with a focus on crop yield. Plant phytointoxication, crop stand, and shoot dry weight were assessed in the greenhouse experiment, and tillering, crop stand, plant height, canopy closure, yield, 1000-grain weight, and hectoliter weight in the field. Under greenhouse conditions, [imazapic + imazapyr], pendimethalin, isoxaflutole, florpyrauxifen, and halosulfuron-methyl produced the best results and were selected for the field experiment. Florpyrauxifen was the only herbicide that was selective both in greenhouse and field experiments. Isoxaflutole and trifluralin did not damage wheat in any of the field evaluations. Despite reducing crop performance in some assessments, pendimethalin and flumioxazin provided yield, hectoliter weight, and 1000-grain weight results equivalent to the herbicide-free control. Florpyrauxifen (1.08 g ha-1) was the most promising herbicide. Trifluralin (900 g ha-1), pendimethalin (1750 g ha-1), isoxaflutole (60 g ha-1), and flumioxazin (40 and 60 g ha-1) also produced grain yields equivalent to the control without herbicide.
id UFERSA-1_4616b5a3eea09f160f3cd5897e18930c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/11681
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling Pre-emergent herbicide screening for wheatSeleção de herbicidas pré-emergentes para o trigoFitointoxicação. Mecanismos de ação. Tolerância. Triticum aestivum.Phytointoxication. Mechanisms of action. Tolerance. Triticum aestivum.Weed control is a challenge in crop management due to the limited number of registered herbicides, especially for pre-emergent application. This study aimed to investigate the selectivity of pre-emergent herbicides with different mechanisms of action for wheat. The experiment consisted of two stages: the first involved screening under greenhouse conditions, and the second assessing the selected treatments under field conditions, with a focus on crop yield. Plant phytointoxication, crop stand, and shoot dry weight were assessed in the greenhouse experiment, and tillering, crop stand, plant height, canopy closure, yield, 1000-grain weight, and hectoliter weight in the field. Under greenhouse conditions, [imazapic + imazapyr], pendimethalin, isoxaflutole, florpyrauxifen, and halosulfuron-methyl produced the best results and were selected for the field experiment. Florpyrauxifen was the only herbicide that was selective both in greenhouse and field experiments. Isoxaflutole and trifluralin did not damage wheat in any of the field evaluations. Despite reducing crop performance in some assessments, pendimethalin and flumioxazin provided yield, hectoliter weight, and 1000-grain weight results equivalent to the herbicide-free control. Florpyrauxifen (1.08 g ha-1) was the most promising herbicide. Trifluralin (900 g ha-1), pendimethalin (1750 g ha-1), isoxaflutole (60 g ha-1), and flumioxazin (40 and 60 g ha-1) also produced grain yields equivalent to the control without herbicide.Uma das dificuldades encontradas no manejo da cultura é o controle de plantas daninhas, pois existem poucas opções de herbicidas registrados, principalmente em pré-emergência. O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar a seletividade dos herbicidas pré-emergentes com diferentes mecanismos de ação para a cultura do trigo. Os experimentos foram divididos em duas etapas: na primeira, foi realizada uma seleção preliminar em casa de vegetação e na segunda, os tratamentos selecionados foram avaliados em campo, visando principalmente a produtividade da cultura. Em casa de vegetação foram avaliadas a fitointoxicação, o estande e a massa seca da parte aérea. Em condições de campo, foram avaliados o estande, o perfilhamento, a altura das plantas, o fechamento do dossel, o rendimento, a massa de mil grãos e o peso hectolitrico. Em estufa, [imazapic + imazapyr], pendimethalin, isoxaflutole, florpyrauxifen e halosulfuron-methyl apresentaram os melhores resultados e foram selecionados para os experimentos em condições de campo. O florpyrauxifen foi o único herbicida que se destacou positivamente na estufa e nas experiências de campo. Isoxaflutole e trifluralin não prejudicaram a cultura em nenhuma das avaliações de campo. Pendimethalin e flumioxazin, embora tenham reduzido o desempenho da cultura em algumas avaliações, forneceram resultados em rendimento, peso de hectolitros e mil massa de grãos equivalente ao controle. Florpyrauxifen (1,08 g ha-1) foi o herbicida mais promissor. Trifluralin (900 g ha-1), pendimethalin (1750 g ha-1), isoxaflutole (60 g ha-1) e flumioxazin (40 e 60 g ha-1) apresentaram um rendimento de grãos equivalente ao controle sem herbicida.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2024-10-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/1168110.1590/1983-21252025v3811681rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 38 (2025); e11681Revista Caatinga; v. 38 (2025); e116811983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11681/11651Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeixeira, Celso Augusto SatoWitter, Ana Paula WerkhausenFerreira, Luiz Augusto InojosaSanches, Ana Karoline silvaOliveira Junior, Rubem Silvério deBiffe, Denis Fernando 2025-04-04T14:17:19Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/11681Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2025-04-04T14:17:19Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pre-emergent herbicide screening for wheat
Seleção de herbicidas pré-emergentes para o trigo
title Pre-emergent herbicide screening for wheat
spellingShingle Pre-emergent herbicide screening for wheat
Teixeira, Celso Augusto Sato
Fitointoxicação. Mecanismos de ação. Tolerância. Triticum aestivum.
Phytointoxication. Mechanisms of action. Tolerance. Triticum aestivum.
title_short Pre-emergent herbicide screening for wheat
title_full Pre-emergent herbicide screening for wheat
title_fullStr Pre-emergent herbicide screening for wheat
title_full_unstemmed Pre-emergent herbicide screening for wheat
title_sort Pre-emergent herbicide screening for wheat
author Teixeira, Celso Augusto Sato
author_facet Teixeira, Celso Augusto Sato
Witter, Ana Paula Werkhausen
Ferreira, Luiz Augusto Inojosa
Sanches, Ana Karoline silva
Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silvério de
Biffe, Denis Fernando
author_role author
author2 Witter, Ana Paula Werkhausen
Ferreira, Luiz Augusto Inojosa
Sanches, Ana Karoline silva
Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silvério de
Biffe, Denis Fernando
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teixeira, Celso Augusto Sato
Witter, Ana Paula Werkhausen
Ferreira, Luiz Augusto Inojosa
Sanches, Ana Karoline silva
Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silvério de
Biffe, Denis Fernando
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fitointoxicação. Mecanismos de ação. Tolerância. Triticum aestivum.
Phytointoxication. Mechanisms of action. Tolerance. Triticum aestivum.
topic Fitointoxicação. Mecanismos de ação. Tolerância. Triticum aestivum.
Phytointoxication. Mechanisms of action. Tolerance. Triticum aestivum.
description Weed control is a challenge in crop management due to the limited number of registered herbicides, especially for pre-emergent application. This study aimed to investigate the selectivity of pre-emergent herbicides with different mechanisms of action for wheat. The experiment consisted of two stages: the first involved screening under greenhouse conditions, and the second assessing the selected treatments under field conditions, with a focus on crop yield. Plant phytointoxication, crop stand, and shoot dry weight were assessed in the greenhouse experiment, and tillering, crop stand, plant height, canopy closure, yield, 1000-grain weight, and hectoliter weight in the field. Under greenhouse conditions, [imazapic + imazapyr], pendimethalin, isoxaflutole, florpyrauxifen, and halosulfuron-methyl produced the best results and were selected for the field experiment. Florpyrauxifen was the only herbicide that was selective both in greenhouse and field experiments. Isoxaflutole and trifluralin did not damage wheat in any of the field evaluations. Despite reducing crop performance in some assessments, pendimethalin and flumioxazin provided yield, hectoliter weight, and 1000-grain weight results equivalent to the herbicide-free control. Florpyrauxifen (1.08 g ha-1) was the most promising herbicide. Trifluralin (900 g ha-1), pendimethalin (1750 g ha-1), isoxaflutole (60 g ha-1), and flumioxazin (40 and 60 g ha-1) also produced grain yields equivalent to the control without herbicide.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-10-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11681
10.1590/1983-21252025v3811681rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11681
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252025v3811681rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11681/11651
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 38 (2025); e11681
Revista Caatinga; v. 38 (2025); e11681
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1831468654488715264