Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Garcia da Silva, Arlindo
Publication Date: 2017
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
Download full: http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88694
Summary: Heterozygosity is an extremely important resource in early breeding programs using autogamous plants becauseit is usually associated with the presence of genetic variability. Induced mutation and artificial hybridization can increasedistinctly the proportion of loci in heterozygosis. This study aimed to compare segregating and mutant populations and relate themechanisms used to generate variability with their respective heterozygosity levels tested. The treatments mutant populations(M2, M3, M4, M5, M6and M7), segregating populations (F4, F5and F6) and lines (BRS Pérola and IPR Uirapuru) were evaluatedby multivariate analysis and compared by orthogonal contrasts. The canonical discriminant analysis revealed which responsevariables contributed to differentiate the treatments assessed. All orthogonal contrasts involving the mutant populations showedsignificant differences, except the contrast between M2vs. M3, M4, M5, M6, M7. The orthogonal contrast between the mutant andsegregating populations denotes a significant variation in the interest in genetic breeding. The traits stem diameter (1.41) andnumber of legumes per plant (2.72) showed the highest canonical weight in this contrast. Conversely, number of grains per plant(-3.58) approached the mutant and segregating populations. No significant difference was observed in the linear comparison ofmeans F5vs. F6. The traits are fixed early in the segregant populations, unlike the mutant populations. Comparatively, inducedmutation provides more loci in heterozygosis than artificial hybridization. Selection pressure should vary according to thevariability creation mechanism used at the beginning of the breeding program.
id UFC-2_e22e88aaa61691ea9da19a06d3d2d94c
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/88694
network_acronym_str UFC-2
network_name_str Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beansPhaseolus vulgaris. Multivariate analysis. Orthogonal contrasts. Multiple allelism. Selection intensity.Heterozygosity is an extremely important resource in early breeding programs using autogamous plants becauseit is usually associated with the presence of genetic variability. Induced mutation and artificial hybridization can increasedistinctly the proportion of loci in heterozygosis. This study aimed to compare segregating and mutant populations and relate themechanisms used to generate variability with their respective heterozygosity levels tested. The treatments mutant populations(M2, M3, M4, M5, M6and M7), segregating populations (F4, F5and F6) and lines (BRS Pérola and IPR Uirapuru) were evaluatedby multivariate analysis and compared by orthogonal contrasts. The canonical discriminant analysis revealed which responsevariables contributed to differentiate the treatments assessed. All orthogonal contrasts involving the mutant populations showedsignificant differences, except the contrast between M2vs. M3, M4, M5, M6, M7. The orthogonal contrast between the mutant andsegregating populations denotes a significant variation in the interest in genetic breeding. The traits stem diameter (1.41) andnumber of legumes per plant (2.72) showed the highest canonical weight in this contrast. Conversely, number of grains per plant(-3.58) approached the mutant and segregating populations. No significant difference was observed in the linear comparison ofmeans F5vs. F6. The traits are fixed early in the segregant populations, unlike the mutant populations. Comparatively, inducedmutation provides more loci in heterozygosis than artificial hybridization. Selection pressure should vary according to thevariability creation mechanism used at the beginning of the breeding program.Revista Ciência Agronômica2017-04-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88694Revista Ciência Agronômica; v. 48 n. 3 (2017); 480-4861806-66900045-6888reponame:Revista ciência agronômica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCenghttp://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88694/242068Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Ciência Agronômicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGarcia da Silva, Arlindo2023-05-12T17:17:54Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/88694Revistahttps://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/oai||alekdutra@ufc.br|| ccarev@ufc.br1806-66900045-6888opendoar:2023-05-12T17:17:54Revista ciência agronômica (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans
title Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans
spellingShingle Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans
Garcia da Silva, Arlindo
Phaseolus vulgaris. Multivariate analysis. Orthogonal contrasts. Multiple allelism. Selection intensity.
title_short Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans
title_full Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans
title_fullStr Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans
title_full_unstemmed Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans
title_sort Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans
author Garcia da Silva, Arlindo
author_facet Garcia da Silva, Arlindo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garcia da Silva, Arlindo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Phaseolus vulgaris. Multivariate analysis. Orthogonal contrasts. Multiple allelism. Selection intensity.
topic Phaseolus vulgaris. Multivariate analysis. Orthogonal contrasts. Multiple allelism. Selection intensity.
description Heterozygosity is an extremely important resource in early breeding programs using autogamous plants becauseit is usually associated with the presence of genetic variability. Induced mutation and artificial hybridization can increasedistinctly the proportion of loci in heterozygosis. This study aimed to compare segregating and mutant populations and relate themechanisms used to generate variability with their respective heterozygosity levels tested. The treatments mutant populations(M2, M3, M4, M5, M6and M7), segregating populations (F4, F5and F6) and lines (BRS Pérola and IPR Uirapuru) were evaluatedby multivariate analysis and compared by orthogonal contrasts. The canonical discriminant analysis revealed which responsevariables contributed to differentiate the treatments assessed. All orthogonal contrasts involving the mutant populations showedsignificant differences, except the contrast between M2vs. M3, M4, M5, M6, M7. The orthogonal contrast between the mutant andsegregating populations denotes a significant variation in the interest in genetic breeding. The traits stem diameter (1.41) andnumber of legumes per plant (2.72) showed the highest canonical weight in this contrast. Conversely, number of grains per plant(-3.58) approached the mutant and segregating populations. No significant difference was observed in the linear comparison ofmeans F5vs. F6. The traits are fixed early in the segregant populations, unlike the mutant populations. Comparatively, inducedmutation provides more loci in heterozygosis than artificial hybridization. Selection pressure should vary according to thevariability creation mechanism used at the beginning of the breeding program.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88694
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88694
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88694/242068
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Ciência Agronômica
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Ciência Agronômica
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ciência Agronômica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ciência Agronômica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ciência Agronômica; v. 48 n. 3 (2017); 480-486
1806-6690
0045-6888
reponame:Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
collection Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista ciência agronômica (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||alekdutra@ufc.br|| ccarev@ufc.br
_version_ 1826232467419299840