Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: de Melo R.C.*
Publication Date: 2017
Other Authors: Trevisani N.*, Pereira T.C.V.*, Guidolin, Altamir Frederico, Coimbra, Jefferson Luis Meirelles
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da Udesc
dARK ID: ark:/33523/001300000qtms
Download full: https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/7267
Summary: Heterozygosity is an extremely important resource in early breeding programs using autogamous plants because it is usually associated with the presence of genetic variability. Induced mutation and artificial hybridization can increase distinctly the proportion of loci in heterozygosis. This study aimed to compare segregating and mutant populations and relate the mechanisms used to generate variability with their respective heterozygosity levels tested. The treatments mutant populations (M2, M3, M4, M5, M6 and M7), segregating populations (F4, F5 and F6) and lines (BRS Pérola and IPR Uirapuru) were evaluated by multivariate analysis and compared by orthogonal contrasts. The canonical discriminant analysis revealed which response variables contributed to differentiate the treatments assessed. All orthogonal contrasts involving the mutant populations showed significant differences, except the contrast between M2vs. M3, M4, M5, M6, M7. The orthogonal contrast between the mutant and segregating populations denotes a significant variation in the interest in genetic breeding. The traits stem diameter (1.41) and number of legumes per plant (2.72) showed the highest canonical weight in this contrast. Conversely, number of grains per plant (-3.58) approached the mutant and segregating populations. No significant difference was observed in the linear comparison of means F5 vs. F6. The traits are fixed early in the segregant populations, unlike the mutant populations. Comparatively, induced mutation provides more loci in heterozygosis than artificial hybridization. Selection pressure should vary according to the variability creation mechanism used at the beginning of the breeding program.
id UDESC-2_80bc4a7c4832e7fb52eed402695880f2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/7267
network_acronym_str UDESC-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository_id_str 6391
spelling Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beansHeterozygosity is an extremely important resource in early breeding programs using autogamous plants because it is usually associated with the presence of genetic variability. Induced mutation and artificial hybridization can increase distinctly the proportion of loci in heterozygosis. This study aimed to compare segregating and mutant populations and relate the mechanisms used to generate variability with their respective heterozygosity levels tested. The treatments mutant populations (M2, M3, M4, M5, M6 and M7), segregating populations (F4, F5 and F6) and lines (BRS Pérola and IPR Uirapuru) were evaluated by multivariate analysis and compared by orthogonal contrasts. The canonical discriminant analysis revealed which response variables contributed to differentiate the treatments assessed. All orthogonal contrasts involving the mutant populations showed significant differences, except the contrast between M2vs. M3, M4, M5, M6, M7. The orthogonal contrast between the mutant and segregating populations denotes a significant variation in the interest in genetic breeding. The traits stem diameter (1.41) and number of legumes per plant (2.72) showed the highest canonical weight in this contrast. Conversely, number of grains per plant (-3.58) approached the mutant and segregating populations. No significant difference was observed in the linear comparison of means F5 vs. F6. The traits are fixed early in the segregant populations, unlike the mutant populations. Comparatively, induced mutation provides more loci in heterozygosis than artificial hybridization. Selection pressure should vary according to the variability creation mechanism used at the beginning of the breeding program.2024-12-06T13:23:14Z2017info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlep. 480 - 4861806-669010.5935/1806-6690.20170056https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/7267ark:/33523/001300000qtmsRevista Ciencia Agronomica483de Melo R.C.*Trevisani N.*Pereira T.C.V.*Guidolin, Altamir FredericoCoimbra, Jefferson Luis Meirellesengreponame:Repositório Institucional da Udescinstname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-07T20:53:39Zoai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/7267Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://pergamumweb.udesc.br/biblioteca/index.phpPRIhttps://repositorio-api.udesc.br/server/oai/requestri@udesc.bropendoar:63912024-12-07T20:53:39Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans
title Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans
spellingShingle Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans
de Melo R.C.*
title_short Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans
title_full Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans
title_fullStr Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans
title_full_unstemmed Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans
title_sort Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans
author de Melo R.C.*
author_facet de Melo R.C.*
Trevisani N.*
Pereira T.C.V.*
Guidolin, Altamir Frederico
Coimbra, Jefferson Luis Meirelles
author_role author
author2 Trevisani N.*
Pereira T.C.V.*
Guidolin, Altamir Frederico
Coimbra, Jefferson Luis Meirelles
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Melo R.C.*
Trevisani N.*
Pereira T.C.V.*
Guidolin, Altamir Frederico
Coimbra, Jefferson Luis Meirelles
description Heterozygosity is an extremely important resource in early breeding programs using autogamous plants because it is usually associated with the presence of genetic variability. Induced mutation and artificial hybridization can increase distinctly the proportion of loci in heterozygosis. This study aimed to compare segregating and mutant populations and relate the mechanisms used to generate variability with their respective heterozygosity levels tested. The treatments mutant populations (M2, M3, M4, M5, M6 and M7), segregating populations (F4, F5 and F6) and lines (BRS Pérola and IPR Uirapuru) were evaluated by multivariate analysis and compared by orthogonal contrasts. The canonical discriminant analysis revealed which response variables contributed to differentiate the treatments assessed. All orthogonal contrasts involving the mutant populations showed significant differences, except the contrast between M2vs. M3, M4, M5, M6, M7. The orthogonal contrast between the mutant and segregating populations denotes a significant variation in the interest in genetic breeding. The traits stem diameter (1.41) and number of legumes per plant (2.72) showed the highest canonical weight in this contrast. Conversely, number of grains per plant (-3.58) approached the mutant and segregating populations. No significant difference was observed in the linear comparison of means F5 vs. F6. The traits are fixed early in the segregant populations, unlike the mutant populations. Comparatively, induced mutation provides more loci in heterozygosis than artificial hybridization. Selection pressure should vary according to the variability creation mechanism used at the beginning of the breeding program.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2024-12-06T13:23:14Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 1806-6690
10.5935/1806-6690.20170056
https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/7267
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/33523/001300000qtms
identifier_str_mv 1806-6690
10.5935/1806-6690.20170056
ark:/33523/001300000qtms
url https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/7267
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ciencia Agronomica
48
3
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv p. 480 - 486
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Udesc
instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron:UDESC
instname_str Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron_str UDESC
institution UDESC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
collection Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri@udesc.br
_version_ 1842258162102566912