Hand function and type of grasp used by chronic stroke individuals in actual environment

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Demartino A.M.*
Publication Date: 2019
Other Authors: Rodrigues L.C.*, Gomes R.P.*, Michaelsen S.M.*
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da Udesc
dARK ID: ark:/33523/001300000dt6c
Download full: https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/5434
Summary: © 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.Background: Knowledge of paretic upper limb (UL) use in the actual environment is crucial for defining treatment strategies that are likely to enhance performance. Objective: To quantify the hand function and type of grasp performed in the actual environment following stroke and determine if any differences in hand use are dependent on the degree of motor impairment. Method: This cross-sectional study enrolled 41 participants with chronic hemiparesis classified as having either mild (11), moderate (20), or severe (10) UL impairment. A behavioral map was used while observing hand use over the 4-h experimental period, during which we checked: activity- unimanual, bimanual or non-task-related; hand function- stabilization, manipulation, reach-to-grasp, gesture, support or push; and type of grasp- digital or whole-hand. Results: Participants with severe impairment did not use the paretic UL spontaneously; analyzing the moderate and mild subgroup together, the predominant UL hand functions were stabilization and manipulation, the paretic UL performs the stabilization function using the whole-hand more frequently (71.2%) than digital (28.8%) grasp. In the subgroup analysis, the paretic and non-paretic UL in the moderate and the paretic UL in the mild subgroup perform the whole-hand stabilization more frequently than digital. Digital grasp is more accomplished by the non-paretic UL in reach-to-grasp hand function, particularly in the mild subgroup. Conclusion: The paretic UL is predominantly employed for stabilization function using a whole-hand grasp. The type of grasp in the actual environment is affected by motor impairment, and greater motor impairment leads to the performance of less complex tasks.
id UDESC-2_dfc1c24b4481d6ab752e59ff7b39ac9a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/5434
network_acronym_str UDESC-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository_id_str 6391
spelling Hand function and type of grasp used by chronic stroke individuals in actual environment© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.Background: Knowledge of paretic upper limb (UL) use in the actual environment is crucial for defining treatment strategies that are likely to enhance performance. Objective: To quantify the hand function and type of grasp performed in the actual environment following stroke and determine if any differences in hand use are dependent on the degree of motor impairment. Method: This cross-sectional study enrolled 41 participants with chronic hemiparesis classified as having either mild (11), moderate (20), or severe (10) UL impairment. A behavioral map was used while observing hand use over the 4-h experimental period, during which we checked: activity- unimanual, bimanual or non-task-related; hand function- stabilization, manipulation, reach-to-grasp, gesture, support or push; and type of grasp- digital or whole-hand. Results: Participants with severe impairment did not use the paretic UL spontaneously; analyzing the moderate and mild subgroup together, the predominant UL hand functions were stabilization and manipulation, the paretic UL performs the stabilization function using the whole-hand more frequently (71.2%) than digital (28.8%) grasp. In the subgroup analysis, the paretic and non-paretic UL in the moderate and the paretic UL in the mild subgroup perform the whole-hand stabilization more frequently than digital. Digital grasp is more accomplished by the non-paretic UL in reach-to-grasp hand function, particularly in the mild subgroup. Conclusion: The paretic UL is predominantly employed for stabilization function using a whole-hand grasp. The type of grasp in the actual environment is affected by motor impairment, and greater motor impairment leads to the performance of less complex tasks.2024-12-06T12:20:46Z2019info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlep. 247 - 2541945-511910.1080/10749357.2019.1591037https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/5434ark:/33523/001300000dt6cTopics in Stroke Rehabilitation264Demartino A.M.*Rodrigues L.C.*Gomes R.P.*Michaelsen S.M.*engreponame:Repositório Institucional da Udescinstname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-07T20:47:42Zoai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/5434Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://pergamumweb.udesc.br/biblioteca/index.phpPRIhttps://repositorio-api.udesc.br/server/oai/requestri@udesc.bropendoar:63912024-12-07T20:47:42Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hand function and type of grasp used by chronic stroke individuals in actual environment
title Hand function and type of grasp used by chronic stroke individuals in actual environment
spellingShingle Hand function and type of grasp used by chronic stroke individuals in actual environment
Demartino A.M.*
title_short Hand function and type of grasp used by chronic stroke individuals in actual environment
title_full Hand function and type of grasp used by chronic stroke individuals in actual environment
title_fullStr Hand function and type of grasp used by chronic stroke individuals in actual environment
title_full_unstemmed Hand function and type of grasp used by chronic stroke individuals in actual environment
title_sort Hand function and type of grasp used by chronic stroke individuals in actual environment
author Demartino A.M.*
author_facet Demartino A.M.*
Rodrigues L.C.*
Gomes R.P.*
Michaelsen S.M.*
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues L.C.*
Gomes R.P.*
Michaelsen S.M.*
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Demartino A.M.*
Rodrigues L.C.*
Gomes R.P.*
Michaelsen S.M.*
description © 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.Background: Knowledge of paretic upper limb (UL) use in the actual environment is crucial for defining treatment strategies that are likely to enhance performance. Objective: To quantify the hand function and type of grasp performed in the actual environment following stroke and determine if any differences in hand use are dependent on the degree of motor impairment. Method: This cross-sectional study enrolled 41 participants with chronic hemiparesis classified as having either mild (11), moderate (20), or severe (10) UL impairment. A behavioral map was used while observing hand use over the 4-h experimental period, during which we checked: activity- unimanual, bimanual or non-task-related; hand function- stabilization, manipulation, reach-to-grasp, gesture, support or push; and type of grasp- digital or whole-hand. Results: Participants with severe impairment did not use the paretic UL spontaneously; analyzing the moderate and mild subgroup together, the predominant UL hand functions were stabilization and manipulation, the paretic UL performs the stabilization function using the whole-hand more frequently (71.2%) than digital (28.8%) grasp. In the subgroup analysis, the paretic and non-paretic UL in the moderate and the paretic UL in the mild subgroup perform the whole-hand stabilization more frequently than digital. Digital grasp is more accomplished by the non-paretic UL in reach-to-grasp hand function, particularly in the mild subgroup. Conclusion: The paretic UL is predominantly employed for stabilization function using a whole-hand grasp. The type of grasp in the actual environment is affected by motor impairment, and greater motor impairment leads to the performance of less complex tasks.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2024-12-06T12:20:46Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 1945-5119
10.1080/10749357.2019.1591037
https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/5434
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/33523/001300000dt6c
identifier_str_mv 1945-5119
10.1080/10749357.2019.1591037
ark:/33523/001300000dt6c
url https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/5434
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
26
4
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv p. 247 - 254
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Udesc
instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron:UDESC
instname_str Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron_str UDESC
institution UDESC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
collection Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri@udesc.br
_version_ 1842258121233268736