Policy of national physical education journals on review articles/systematic reviews Política de periódicos nacionais em educação física para estudos de revisão/sistemática
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2011 |
Other Authors: | , |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da Udesc |
dARK ID: | ark:/33523/001300000pxxk |
Download full: | https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/9489 |
Summary: | The large amount of scientific information that is produced and available in different areas, including physical education, requires the summary of contents. Different synthesis/review methods that lead to different answers are available. The objective of this study was to analyze the policy of national physical education journals on review articles, to quantify the reviews, and to classify them as systematic and narrative reviews based on established criteria. All journals (n=13) offer the possibility to publish review articles, but do not have specific standards/methods for this type of article. The production of review articles was high (n=429), with the publication of 371 (86%) narrative reviews and 58 (14%) systematic reviews. A priori, narrative reviews are used for the production of knowledge by internationally renowned scientific researchers. However, the volume of production of this type of review, as diverse as the issues in physical education are, does not seem to be proportional to the number of recognized researchers. This fact can lead to lower quality of the scientific production and rejection of these articles, as observed for journals in other areas. In view of the criteria and method employed, systematic reviews seem to be more valuable in situations in which no renowned researchers wants to produce review articles, avoiding a poor outcome. This type of review is characterized by more scientific rigor, whose production follows specific steps and standards, and also seems to be more appreciated by journal editors, with these reviews sometimes even being classified as original articles. |
id |
UDESC-2_9a660d36f3ab470946c210c59e664520 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/9489 |
network_acronym_str |
UDESC-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da Udesc |
repository_id_str |
6391 |
spelling |
Policy of national physical education journals on review articles/systematic reviews Política de periódicos nacionais em educação física para estudos de revisão/sistemáticaThe large amount of scientific information that is produced and available in different areas, including physical education, requires the summary of contents. Different synthesis/review methods that lead to different answers are available. The objective of this study was to analyze the policy of national physical education journals on review articles, to quantify the reviews, and to classify them as systematic and narrative reviews based on established criteria. All journals (n=13) offer the possibility to publish review articles, but do not have specific standards/methods for this type of article. The production of review articles was high (n=429), with the publication of 371 (86%) narrative reviews and 58 (14%) systematic reviews. A priori, narrative reviews are used for the production of knowledge by internationally renowned scientific researchers. However, the volume of production of this type of review, as diverse as the issues in physical education are, does not seem to be proportional to the number of recognized researchers. This fact can lead to lower quality of the scientific production and rejection of these articles, as observed for journals in other areas. In view of the criteria and method employed, systematic reviews seem to be more valuable in situations in which no renowned researchers wants to produce review articles, avoiding a poor outcome. This type of review is characterized by more scientific rigor, whose production follows specific steps and standards, and also seems to be more appreciated by journal editors, with these reviews sometimes even being classified as original articles.2024-12-06T19:12:21Z2011Artigo de revisãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionp. 313 - 3191980-003710.5007/1980-0037.2011v13n4p313https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/9489ark:/33523/001300000pxxkRevista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano134Schutz G.R.*Sant'Ana A.S.S.dos Santos S.G.engreponame:Repositório Institucional da Udescinstname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-07T21:03:11Zoai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/9489Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://pergamumweb.udesc.br/biblioteca/index.phpPRIhttps://repositorio-api.udesc.br/server/oai/requestri@udesc.bropendoar:63912024-12-07T21:03:11Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Policy of national physical education journals on review articles/systematic reviews Política de periódicos nacionais em educação física para estudos de revisão/sistemática |
title |
Policy of national physical education journals on review articles/systematic reviews Política de periódicos nacionais em educação física para estudos de revisão/sistemática |
spellingShingle |
Policy of national physical education journals on review articles/systematic reviews Política de periódicos nacionais em educação física para estudos de revisão/sistemática Schutz G.R.* |
title_short |
Policy of national physical education journals on review articles/systematic reviews Política de periódicos nacionais em educação física para estudos de revisão/sistemática |
title_full |
Policy of national physical education journals on review articles/systematic reviews Política de periódicos nacionais em educação física para estudos de revisão/sistemática |
title_fullStr |
Policy of national physical education journals on review articles/systematic reviews Política de periódicos nacionais em educação física para estudos de revisão/sistemática |
title_full_unstemmed |
Policy of national physical education journals on review articles/systematic reviews Política de periódicos nacionais em educação física para estudos de revisão/sistemática |
title_sort |
Policy of national physical education journals on review articles/systematic reviews Política de periódicos nacionais em educação física para estudos de revisão/sistemática |
author |
Schutz G.R.* |
author_facet |
Schutz G.R.* Sant'Ana A.S.S. dos Santos S.G. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sant'Ana A.S.S. dos Santos S.G. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schutz G.R.* Sant'Ana A.S.S. dos Santos S.G. |
description |
The large amount of scientific information that is produced and available in different areas, including physical education, requires the summary of contents. Different synthesis/review methods that lead to different answers are available. The objective of this study was to analyze the policy of national physical education journals on review articles, to quantify the reviews, and to classify them as systematic and narrative reviews based on established criteria. All journals (n=13) offer the possibility to publish review articles, but do not have specific standards/methods for this type of article. The production of review articles was high (n=429), with the publication of 371 (86%) narrative reviews and 58 (14%) systematic reviews. A priori, narrative reviews are used for the production of knowledge by internationally renowned scientific researchers. However, the volume of production of this type of review, as diverse as the issues in physical education are, does not seem to be proportional to the number of recognized researchers. This fact can lead to lower quality of the scientific production and rejection of these articles, as observed for journals in other areas. In view of the criteria and method employed, systematic reviews seem to be more valuable in situations in which no renowned researchers wants to produce review articles, avoiding a poor outcome. This type of review is characterized by more scientific rigor, whose production follows specific steps and standards, and also seems to be more appreciated by journal editors, with these reviews sometimes even being classified as original articles. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011 2024-12-06T19:12:21Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Artigo de revisão |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
1980-0037 10.5007/1980-0037.2011v13n4p313 https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/9489 |
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv |
ark:/33523/001300000pxxk |
identifier_str_mv |
1980-0037 10.5007/1980-0037.2011v13n4p313 ark:/33523/001300000pxxk |
url |
https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/9489 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano 13 4 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
p. 313 - 319 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da Udesc instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) instacron:UDESC |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) |
instacron_str |
UDESC |
institution |
UDESC |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da Udesc |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da Udesc |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ri@udesc.br |
_version_ |
1842258158231224320 |