Effect of remineralizer on soil biological quality
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Other Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da Udesc |
dARK ID: | ark:/33523/001300000991t |
Download full: | https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1494 |
Summary: | © Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS), Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS), Institute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS) 2024.The use of remineralizers has been highlighted as a viable option for alternative fertilizer sources. However, it is necessary to study the impacts of its use on the biological quality of the soil. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the remineralizer on the diversity of the edaphic fauna. The research was carried out in a randomized block design, with four replications and the following treatments: T0: control; T1: 100% of N-P-K; T2: Fertilization only with remineralizer; T3: 75% of N-P-K + remineralizer; T4: 75% of N-P-K + remineralizer + Azospirillum spp.; T5: 75% of N-P-K + remineralizer + Bacillus spp.; T6: 75% of N-P-K + Azospirillum spp.; T7: 75% of N-P-K + Bacillus spp. The soil fauna was sampled two times of the year using pitfall traps, and soil samples were collected at the same points for explanatory variables (chemical and microbiological attributes of the soil). The diversity of groups varied between the collection times, and the most frequent were Collembola, Formicidae, and Acari. The use of remineralizer favored the diversity of groups and the establishment of Collembola populations compared to treatments with conventional fertilizer. |
id |
UDESC-2_239556c449ab05b5ee8ef6ffec52e6d3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/1494 |
network_acronym_str |
UDESC-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da Udesc |
repository_id_str |
6391 |
spelling |
Effect of remineralizer on soil biological quality© Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS), Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS), Institute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS) 2024.The use of remineralizers has been highlighted as a viable option for alternative fertilizer sources. However, it is necessary to study the impacts of its use on the biological quality of the soil. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the remineralizer on the diversity of the edaphic fauna. The research was carried out in a randomized block design, with four replications and the following treatments: T0: control; T1: 100% of N-P-K; T2: Fertilization only with remineralizer; T3: 75% of N-P-K + remineralizer; T4: 75% of N-P-K + remineralizer + Azospirillum spp.; T5: 75% of N-P-K + remineralizer + Bacillus spp.; T6: 75% of N-P-K + Azospirillum spp.; T7: 75% of N-P-K + Bacillus spp. The soil fauna was sampled two times of the year using pitfall traps, and soil samples were collected at the same points for explanatory variables (chemical and microbiological attributes of the soil). The diversity of groups varied between the collection times, and the most frequent were Collembola, Formicidae, and Acari. The use of remineralizer favored the diversity of groups and the establishment of Collembola populations compared to treatments with conventional fertilizer.2024-12-05T13:14:58Z2024info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlep. 3327 - 33361336-956310.1007/s11756-024-01783-6https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1494ark:/33523/001300000991tBiologia7911Rosalen K.*Baretta C.R.D.M.Oliveira Filho L.C.L.*Galina J.*Baretta, DilmarGolin I.L.*engreponame:Repositório Institucional da Udescinstname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-07T20:35:58Zoai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/1494Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://pergamumweb.udesc.br/biblioteca/index.phpPRIhttps://repositorio-api.udesc.br/server/oai/requestri@udesc.bropendoar:63912024-12-07T20:35:58Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of remineralizer on soil biological quality |
title |
Effect of remineralizer on soil biological quality |
spellingShingle |
Effect of remineralizer on soil biological quality Rosalen K.* |
title_short |
Effect of remineralizer on soil biological quality |
title_full |
Effect of remineralizer on soil biological quality |
title_fullStr |
Effect of remineralizer on soil biological quality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of remineralizer on soil biological quality |
title_sort |
Effect of remineralizer on soil biological quality |
author |
Rosalen K.* |
author_facet |
Rosalen K.* Baretta C.R.D.M. Oliveira Filho L.C.L.* Galina J.* Baretta, Dilmar Golin I.L.* |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Baretta C.R.D.M. Oliveira Filho L.C.L.* Galina J.* Baretta, Dilmar Golin I.L.* |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rosalen K.* Baretta C.R.D.M. Oliveira Filho L.C.L.* Galina J.* Baretta, Dilmar Golin I.L.* |
description |
© Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS), Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS), Institute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS) 2024.The use of remineralizers has been highlighted as a viable option for alternative fertilizer sources. However, it is necessary to study the impacts of its use on the biological quality of the soil. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the remineralizer on the diversity of the edaphic fauna. The research was carried out in a randomized block design, with four replications and the following treatments: T0: control; T1: 100% of N-P-K; T2: Fertilization only with remineralizer; T3: 75% of N-P-K + remineralizer; T4: 75% of N-P-K + remineralizer + Azospirillum spp.; T5: 75% of N-P-K + remineralizer + Bacillus spp.; T6: 75% of N-P-K + Azospirillum spp.; T7: 75% of N-P-K + Bacillus spp. The soil fauna was sampled two times of the year using pitfall traps, and soil samples were collected at the same points for explanatory variables (chemical and microbiological attributes of the soil). The diversity of groups varied between the collection times, and the most frequent were Collembola, Formicidae, and Acari. The use of remineralizer favored the diversity of groups and the establishment of Collembola populations compared to treatments with conventional fertilizer. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-12-05T13:14:58Z 2024 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
1336-9563 10.1007/s11756-024-01783-6 https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1494 |
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv |
ark:/33523/001300000991t |
identifier_str_mv |
1336-9563 10.1007/s11756-024-01783-6 ark:/33523/001300000991t |
url |
https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1494 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Biologia 79 11 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
p. 3327 - 3336 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da Udesc instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) instacron:UDESC |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) |
instacron_str |
UDESC |
institution |
UDESC |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da Udesc |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da Udesc |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ri@udesc.br |
_version_ |
1842258106415841280 |