Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2018 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) |
Download full: | https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/9815 |
Summary: | The objective of this study was to verify the influence of mechanized shoot topping in workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs to perform the grapevine pruning in the highlands of Santa Catarina, Brazil. The experiment was conducted at São Joaquim Experimental Station during the 2016 crop. Shoot topping was performed during phase 75 of the BBCH scale. The treatments consisted of three different shoot topping methods: manual shoot topping, manual shoot topping using a platform coupled to a tractor and semi-mechanized shoot topping performed with a mechanical pruner using a platform coupled to a tractor. The experimental design was completely randomized. Data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey’s test was performed (p ≤ 0.05). The semi-mechanized pruning method presented a 1,106% reduction in time to perform shoot topping in comparison to the manual method. The cost for semi-mechanized topping was R$ 289.70 ha-1, manual topping costed R$ 665.00 ha-1, and manual topping with the platform costed R$ 766.40 ha-1. The semi-mechanization of shoot topping with a mechanical pruner using a platform coupled to a tractor reduces the production costs, in addition to optimizing the use of workforce. |
id |
UDESC-10_ea9d180bbd36aa357ec00fc0eb39a8a3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai::article/9815 |
network_acronym_str |
UDESC-10 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevinesDesponte semi-mecanizado como alternativa de otimização da mão-de-obra e redução dos custos operacionais do manejo de poda verde da videiraVitis vinifera L.vegetative canopymechanizationviticultureVitis vinifera L.dossel vegetativomecanizaçãovitiviniculturaThe objective of this study was to verify the influence of mechanized shoot topping in workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs to perform the grapevine pruning in the highlands of Santa Catarina, Brazil. The experiment was conducted at São Joaquim Experimental Station during the 2016 crop. Shoot topping was performed during phase 75 of the BBCH scale. The treatments consisted of three different shoot topping methods: manual shoot topping, manual shoot topping using a platform coupled to a tractor and semi-mechanized shoot topping performed with a mechanical pruner using a platform coupled to a tractor. The experimental design was completely randomized. Data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey’s test was performed (p ≤ 0.05). The semi-mechanized pruning method presented a 1,106% reduction in time to perform shoot topping in comparison to the manual method. The cost for semi-mechanized topping was R$ 289.70 ha-1, manual topping costed R$ 665.00 ha-1, and manual topping with the platform costed R$ 766.40 ha-1. The semi-mechanization of shoot topping with a mechanical pruner using a platform coupled to a tractor reduces the production costs, in addition to optimizing the use of workforce.O objetivo deste trabalho foi verificar a influência de métodos de desponte mecanizado na otimização da mão-de-obra e redução de custos operacionais do desponte da videira em região de elevada altitude de Santa Catarina. O trabalho foi conduzido na Estação Experimental de São Joaquim (Epagri), na safra 2016. O desponte foi realizado durante a fase 75 na escala BBCH. Os tratamentos consistiram em três diferentes métodos de desponte da videira: desponte manual, desponte manual com plataforma acoplada em trator e desponte semi-mecanizado com podador mecânico com auxílio de plataforma acoplada em trator. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o inteiramente casualizado. Os dados foram submetidos a análise da variância, sendo realizado o teste Tukey (p≤0,05). O desponte semi-mecanizado apresentou uma redução de 1.106% no tempo para realização do desponte em comparação com o método manual. Verificou-se um custo de R$ 289,70 ha-1 para o desponte semi-mecanizado, enquanto o desponte manual apresentou um custo de R$ 665,00 ha-1, enquanto o desponte manual com plataforma apresentou um custo de R$ 766,40 ha-1. A semi-mecanização do desponte com a utilização de um podador mecânico com plataforma acoplada ao trator reduziu os custos dessa prática de manejo cultural, otimizando o uso de mão-de-obra.Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina2018-09-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/981510.5965/223811711732018440Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; Vol. 17 No. 3 (2018); 440-443Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; v. 17 n. 3 (2018); 440-4432238-1171reponame:Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online)instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCporhttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/9815/pdfCopyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Journal of Agroveterinary Sciences)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWürz, Douglas AndréBrighenti, Alberto FontanellaAllebrandt, Ricardode Bem, Betina PereiraBonin, Bruno FariasMarcon Filho, José LuizBrighenti, EmilioRufato, Leo2022-07-12T13:26:15Zoai::article/9815Revistahttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/PUBhttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/oairca.cav@udesc.br | portal.periodicos@udesc.brhttps://doi.org/10.5965/223811712238-11711676-9732opendoar:2022-07-12T13:26:15Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines Desponte semi-mecanizado como alternativa de otimização da mão-de-obra e redução dos custos operacionais do manejo de poda verde da videira |
title |
Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines |
spellingShingle |
Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines Würz, Douglas André Vitis vinifera L. vegetative canopy mechanization viticulture Vitis vinifera L. dossel vegetativo mecanização vitivinicultura |
title_short |
Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines |
title_full |
Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines |
title_fullStr |
Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines |
title_full_unstemmed |
Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines |
title_sort |
Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines |
author |
Würz, Douglas André |
author_facet |
Würz, Douglas André Brighenti, Alberto Fontanella Allebrandt, Ricardo de Bem, Betina Pereira Bonin, Bruno Farias Marcon Filho, José Luiz Brighenti, Emilio Rufato, Leo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Brighenti, Alberto Fontanella Allebrandt, Ricardo de Bem, Betina Pereira Bonin, Bruno Farias Marcon Filho, José Luiz Brighenti, Emilio Rufato, Leo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Würz, Douglas André Brighenti, Alberto Fontanella Allebrandt, Ricardo de Bem, Betina Pereira Bonin, Bruno Farias Marcon Filho, José Luiz Brighenti, Emilio Rufato, Leo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Vitis vinifera L. vegetative canopy mechanization viticulture Vitis vinifera L. dossel vegetativo mecanização vitivinicultura |
topic |
Vitis vinifera L. vegetative canopy mechanization viticulture Vitis vinifera L. dossel vegetativo mecanização vitivinicultura |
description |
The objective of this study was to verify the influence of mechanized shoot topping in workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs to perform the grapevine pruning in the highlands of Santa Catarina, Brazil. The experiment was conducted at São Joaquim Experimental Station during the 2016 crop. Shoot topping was performed during phase 75 of the BBCH scale. The treatments consisted of three different shoot topping methods: manual shoot topping, manual shoot topping using a platform coupled to a tractor and semi-mechanized shoot topping performed with a mechanical pruner using a platform coupled to a tractor. The experimental design was completely randomized. Data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey’s test was performed (p ≤ 0.05). The semi-mechanized pruning method presented a 1,106% reduction in time to perform shoot topping in comparison to the manual method. The cost for semi-mechanized topping was R$ 289.70 ha-1, manual topping costed R$ 665.00 ha-1, and manual topping with the platform costed R$ 766.40 ha-1. The semi-mechanization of shoot topping with a mechanical pruner using a platform coupled to a tractor reduces the production costs, in addition to optimizing the use of workforce. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/9815 10.5965/223811711732018440 |
url |
https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/9815 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5965/223811711732018440 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/9815/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Journal of Agroveterinary Sciences) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Journal of Agroveterinary Sciences) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; Vol. 17 No. 3 (2018); 440-443 Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; v. 17 n. 3 (2018); 440-443 2238-1171 reponame:Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) instacron:UDESC |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) |
instacron_str |
UDESC |
institution |
UDESC |
reponame_str |
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) |
collection |
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rca.cav@udesc.br | portal.periodicos@udesc.br |
_version_ |
1842261008465264640 |