Export Ready — 

Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Würz, Douglas André
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Brighenti, Alberto Fontanella, Allebrandt, Ricardo, de Bem, Betina Pereira, Bonin, Bruno Farias, Marcon Filho, José Luiz, Brighenti, Emilio, Rufato, Leo
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online)
Download full: https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/9815
Summary: The objective of this study was to verify the influence of mechanized shoot topping in workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs to perform the grapevine pruning in the highlands of Santa Catarina, Brazil. The experiment was conducted at São Joaquim Experimental Station during the 2016 crop. Shoot topping was performed during phase 75 of the BBCH scale. The treatments consisted of three different shoot topping methods: manual shoot topping, manual shoot topping using a platform coupled to a tractor and semi-mechanized shoot topping performed with a mechanical pruner using a platform coupled to a tractor. The experimental design was completely randomized. Data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey’s test was performed (p ≤ 0.05).  The semi-mechanized pruning method presented a 1,106% reduction in time to perform shoot topping in comparison to the manual method. The cost for semi-mechanized topping was R$ 289.70 ha-1, manual topping costed R$ 665.00 ha-1, and manual topping with the platform costed R$ 766.40 ha-1. The semi-mechanization of shoot topping with a mechanical pruner using a platform coupled to a tractor reduces the production costs, in addition to optimizing the use of workforce.
id UDESC-10_ea9d180bbd36aa357ec00fc0eb39a8a3
oai_identifier_str oai::article/9815
network_acronym_str UDESC-10
network_name_str Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevinesDesponte semi-mecanizado como alternativa de otimização da mão-de-obra e redução dos custos operacionais do manejo de poda verde da videiraVitis vinifera L.vegetative canopymechanizationviticultureVitis vinifera L.dossel vegetativomecanizaçãovitiviniculturaThe objective of this study was to verify the influence of mechanized shoot topping in workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs to perform the grapevine pruning in the highlands of Santa Catarina, Brazil. The experiment was conducted at São Joaquim Experimental Station during the 2016 crop. Shoot topping was performed during phase 75 of the BBCH scale. The treatments consisted of three different shoot topping methods: manual shoot topping, manual shoot topping using a platform coupled to a tractor and semi-mechanized shoot topping performed with a mechanical pruner using a platform coupled to a tractor. The experimental design was completely randomized. Data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey’s test was performed (p ≤ 0.05).  The semi-mechanized pruning method presented a 1,106% reduction in time to perform shoot topping in comparison to the manual method. The cost for semi-mechanized topping was R$ 289.70 ha-1, manual topping costed R$ 665.00 ha-1, and manual topping with the platform costed R$ 766.40 ha-1. The semi-mechanization of shoot topping with a mechanical pruner using a platform coupled to a tractor reduces the production costs, in addition to optimizing the use of workforce.O objetivo deste trabalho foi verificar a influência de métodos de desponte mecanizado na otimização da mão-de-obra e redução de custos operacionais do desponte da videira em região de elevada altitude de Santa Catarina. O trabalho foi conduzido na Estação Experimental de São Joaquim (Epagri), na safra 2016.  O desponte foi realizado durante a fase 75 na escala BBCH. Os tratamentos consistiram em três diferentes métodos de desponte da videira: desponte manual, desponte manual com plataforma acoplada em trator e desponte semi-mecanizado com podador mecânico com auxílio de plataforma acoplada em trator. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o inteiramente casualizado. Os dados foram submetidos a análise da variância, sendo realizado o teste Tukey (p≤0,05). O desponte semi-mecanizado apresentou uma redução de 1.106% no tempo para realização do desponte em comparação com o método manual. Verificou-se um custo de R$ 289,70 ha-1 para o desponte semi-mecanizado, enquanto o desponte manual apresentou um custo de R$ 665,00 ha-1, enquanto o desponte manual com plataforma apresentou um custo de R$ 766,40 ha-1. A semi-mecanização do desponte com a utilização de um podador mecânico com plataforma acoplada ao trator reduziu os custos dessa prática de manejo cultural, otimizando o uso de mão-de-obra.Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina2018-09-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/981510.5965/223811711732018440Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; Vol. 17 No. 3 (2018); 440-443Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; v. 17 n. 3 (2018); 440-4432238-1171reponame:Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online)instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCporhttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/9815/pdfCopyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Journal of Agroveterinary Sciences)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWürz, Douglas AndréBrighenti, Alberto FontanellaAllebrandt, Ricardode Bem, Betina PereiraBonin, Bruno FariasMarcon Filho, José LuizBrighenti, EmilioRufato, Leo2022-07-12T13:26:15Zoai::article/9815Revistahttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/PUBhttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/oairca.cav@udesc.br | portal.periodicos@udesc.brhttps://doi.org/10.5965/223811712238-11711676-9732opendoar:2022-07-12T13:26:15Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines
Desponte semi-mecanizado como alternativa de otimização da mão-de-obra e redução dos custos operacionais do manejo de poda verde da videira
title Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines
spellingShingle Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines
Würz, Douglas André
Vitis vinifera L.
vegetative canopy
mechanization
viticulture
Vitis vinifera L.
dossel vegetativo
mecanização
vitivinicultura
title_short Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines
title_full Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines
title_fullStr Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines
title_full_unstemmed Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines
title_sort Semi-mechanized shoot topping as an alternative for workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs of summer pruning management of grapevines
author Würz, Douglas André
author_facet Würz, Douglas André
Brighenti, Alberto Fontanella
Allebrandt, Ricardo
de Bem, Betina Pereira
Bonin, Bruno Farias
Marcon Filho, José Luiz
Brighenti, Emilio
Rufato, Leo
author_role author
author2 Brighenti, Alberto Fontanella
Allebrandt, Ricardo
de Bem, Betina Pereira
Bonin, Bruno Farias
Marcon Filho, José Luiz
Brighenti, Emilio
Rufato, Leo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Würz, Douglas André
Brighenti, Alberto Fontanella
Allebrandt, Ricardo
de Bem, Betina Pereira
Bonin, Bruno Farias
Marcon Filho, José Luiz
Brighenti, Emilio
Rufato, Leo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Vitis vinifera L.
vegetative canopy
mechanization
viticulture
Vitis vinifera L.
dossel vegetativo
mecanização
vitivinicultura
topic Vitis vinifera L.
vegetative canopy
mechanization
viticulture
Vitis vinifera L.
dossel vegetativo
mecanização
vitivinicultura
description The objective of this study was to verify the influence of mechanized shoot topping in workforce optimization and reduction of operational costs to perform the grapevine pruning in the highlands of Santa Catarina, Brazil. The experiment was conducted at São Joaquim Experimental Station during the 2016 crop. Shoot topping was performed during phase 75 of the BBCH scale. The treatments consisted of three different shoot topping methods: manual shoot topping, manual shoot topping using a platform coupled to a tractor and semi-mechanized shoot topping performed with a mechanical pruner using a platform coupled to a tractor. The experimental design was completely randomized. Data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey’s test was performed (p ≤ 0.05).  The semi-mechanized pruning method presented a 1,106% reduction in time to perform shoot topping in comparison to the manual method. The cost for semi-mechanized topping was R$ 289.70 ha-1, manual topping costed R$ 665.00 ha-1, and manual topping with the platform costed R$ 766.40 ha-1. The semi-mechanization of shoot topping with a mechanical pruner using a platform coupled to a tractor reduces the production costs, in addition to optimizing the use of workforce.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/9815
10.5965/223811711732018440
url https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/9815
identifier_str_mv 10.5965/223811711732018440
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/9815/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Journal of Agroveterinary Sciences)
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Journal of Agroveterinary Sciences)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; Vol. 17 No. 3 (2018); 440-443
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; v. 17 n. 3 (2018); 440-443
2238-1171
reponame:Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online)
instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron:UDESC
instname_str Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron_str UDESC
institution UDESC
reponame_str Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online)
collection Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rca.cav@udesc.br | portal.periodicos@udesc.br
_version_ 1842261008465264640